The Jerusalem Post

The big chill sets in, once again

Israel must resist the US fantasy for a swift, dangerousl­y indecisive end to the Gaza war

- KNOW COMMENT • By DAVID M. WEINBERG The writer is senior managing fellow at the Misgav Institute for National Security & Zionist Strategy, in Jerusalem. The views expressed here are his own. His diplomatic, defense, political, and Jewish world columns ov

in june 2014, then-us president Barack obama green-lighted a Fatah-hamas unity coalition, leaving israel ominously isolated. israel stood by its solitary self in absolute opposition to the government cunningly created by mahmoud abbas and ismail haniyeh.

just about every Western leader was prepared to swallow the palestinia­n deception in which “technocrat­s” were to run government ministries as stand-ins for the real power brokers in palestinia­n politics (i.e., hamas). just about everybody was prepared to play dumb and pretend that iranian-backed jihadists committed to the genocide of the jewish people in the land of israel weren’t going to be the recipients of Western aid and diplomatic cooperatio­n.

Nobody was prepared to admit that the palestinia­n authority had gone defunct; that palestinia­n statehood had become a hazardous idea; and that israel had no genuine palestinia­n partner for a peaceful two-state scenario.

obama and the europeans were unable to acknowledg­e any of this since they had invested so heavily in the pa and abbas, and it was so much simpler to vilify israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu as the obstacle to peace.

indeed, distancing america from israel had been obama’s modus operandi from day one. he infamously warned in march 2014 that israel could expect to face internatio­nal isolation and sanctions from countries and companies across the world if Netanyahu failed to endorse his bid for palestinia­n statehood.

he proceeded to lament the fact that america, in his words, did not any longer have absolute power in this “diffuse” world, and that he would not be able to “manage” the coming anti-israel fallout.

there wasn’t really much anguish in obama’s voice. obama wasn’t too upset about israel’s “impending isolation” or the fact that america “would have reduced influence in issues that are of interest to israel.”

it was all very artificial. obama was merely feigning dismay at the possible isolation of israel, while in practice purposeful­ly paving the way towards israel’s isolation and an american distancing from israel.

the give-away was obama’s total failure to place any responsibi­lity on palestinia­n leaders for retardatio­n of peace. there

was not a smidgeon of answerabil­ity that he attached to abbas or hamas. he had nothing to say about hamas stockpilin­g of iranian missiles and rpGs. he issued no warnings of pa diplomatic isolation or economic collapse if abbas did not compromise and advance the peace process. only to Netanyahu.

But of course, obama truly “wished he had the influence” to arrest the isolation of israel. yeah, right. the big chill was on. this history is relevant to the current moment when israel is being threatened once again with “internatio­nal isolation” and even an arms boycott by a us administra­tion filled with obama acolytes.

us-israel relations are indeed at a watershed moment following the administra­tion’s decision this week to abstain on (i.e., not veto) a rotten uN security council resolution that thoroughly delegitimi­zes israel’s necessary and continuing war effort to eliminate hamas in Gaza.

Next will be a long series of demonizing

and criminaliz­ing anti-israel resolution­s in uN agencies and internatio­nal courts. (the human rights council discussed four vicious reports on israel this week and is to front several resolution­s including a finding of “genocide” supposedly being committed by israel against palestinia­ns in Gaza.)

internatio­nalizing the conflict and criminaliz­ing israel always was a central palestinia­n strategy. alas, us president joe Biden and secretary of state antony Blinken are now acquiescin­g in this horrible scheme, in order to wedge israel into their fantasy framework for a swift, dangerousl­y indecisive, end to the Gaza war.

this includes a gambit for “revitalize­d” palestinia­n statehood and a magnanimou­s soft deal with iran that magically will make all regional wars go away, from sana’a to Beirut and rafah.

like obama, Biden and Blinken will be “unable to manage” or mount a defense of israel if israel does not bend to their will.

the big chill again coming from Washington is uncomforta­ble, but israel has no choice but to resist. it is not an exaggerati­on to say that israel stands at a moment of grand diplomatic inflection, a pivotal moment with historical implicatio­ns for israel’s sovereignt­y and long-term security.

at issue is not just the question of how and when to destroy the remaining four hamas brigades in rafah in Gaza. Nor is the issue humanitari­an aid to palestinia­ns trapped in the hell created by hamas.

at issue is the regional and internatio­nal perception of israel as a country capable of resounding­ly winning an existentia­l war of self-defense; a war against the first muslim Brotherhoo­d state ever establishe­d (hamas in Gaza), a state that has genocidal plans for israel long into the future again and again – unless eliminated. at issue is the regional and internatio­nal perception of israel as a country with the determinat­ion to rout the iranian-backed hamas, islamic jihad, and hezbollah proxies that have forced israel into repeated rounds of draining warfare, and which now have depopulate­d and destroyed significan­t parts of southern and northern israel.

at issue is the regional and internatio­nal perception of israel as a nation that cannot be steamrolle­d into diplomatic or military defeat; that is able to act on its essential security imperative­s and free all of israel (including tel aviv, jerusalem, and judea and samaria) of terrorist violence and rocket attacks.

at issue are regional and internatio­nal perception­s of israel as a society that is unified, resolute, and just; whose moral compass in wartime is unwavering; and whose partnershi­p is reliable.

What the Biden administra­tion all-ofa-sudden does not seem to understand (perhaps due to narrow electoral reasons), is that israelis are mobilized and united to unambiguou­sly win, with crushing certainty. this is not just “Netanyahu’s war,” as Western wags have slurred.

For all of Biden’s true personal commitment to israel, his administra­tion also does not seem to comprehend that Western civilizati­on itself is under attack from radical islamist barbarians – with the hamas war on israel (alongside hezbollah and houthi attacks) being only the frontline of a broader assault on “rome,” i.e., all the West.

this is truly a world war that cannot be nicely dialed down by accommodat­ionist diplomacy. and this is a war that best can be won if Washington stands by natural allies like israel instead of punishing them.

israel cannot knuckle under. israel stands quite alone, but what is new about that? “lo, the people shall dwell alone, and shall not be reckoned among the nations” (Numbers 23:9). Being “unreckoned” is unnerving but familiar territory for the people and the state of israel.

this is not a desirable situation, nor should israel accept this as a permanent reality. there is much israel must do to overcome gaps between its perception of the immediate and long-term challenges and those of other nations. there is much that israel can and will do by resolute action that will force a grudging, positive reassessme­nt by other nations, in due time.

 ?? (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters) ?? PRIME MINISTER Benjamin Netanyahu meets with then-US president Barack Obama at the White House, 2014. ‘The big chill sets in, once again,’ says the writer.
(Kevin Lamarque/Reuters) PRIME MINISTER Benjamin Netanyahu meets with then-US president Barack Obama at the White House, 2014. ‘The big chill sets in, once again,’ says the writer.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel