We approached Israel after October 7 with hostage deal, response took a week
Qatari officials speak up for the first time on their role in hostage mediation
DOHA, Qatar – In the complex tapestry of Middle Eastern diplomacy, Qatar emerges as a paradox.
On the one hand, it positions itself as a mediator and peacemaker, instrumental in negotiating high-profile hostage releases and actively participating in regional discussions, a role that has placed it in the international spotlight in the aftermath of the Hamas-led October 7 attack.
This role, as articulated by senior Qatari officials during my visit, reveals a nation striving for a larger purpose on the world stage. Their efforts, they assert, are in alignment with the broader objectives of global powers like the US and Israel, aimed at fostering stability in a tumultuous region.
Yet, there’s a palpable undercurrent of skepticism about Qatar’s true intentions. Its financial support to Gaza, often labeled as aid to Hamas, as well their policy of allowing that group’s top leaders to reside in their country, are focal points of contention.
Qatari officials contend that these actions are not unilateral, but responses to requests from Israeli and US governments, aimed at stabilizing the region and averting humanitarian crises. They argue that their unique position enables them to mediate complex issues effectively, including the Israel-Hamas dynamics. Despite these explanations, the arrangement continues to spark debates and suspicions in Israel and beyond.
As an Israeli journalist delving into the depths of Qatar’s foreign policy and regional actions, I find myself navigating a narrative that’s both enlightening and elusive.
Last week, I conducted more than 15 hours of interviews and off-the-record briefings with the most senior Qatari government officials, who asked to remain anonymous. They were eager to share their complex history and relationship with Israel.