Daily Observer (Jamaica)

Opposition celebrates another constituti­onal win

- BY JASON CROSS Observer staff reporter crossj@jamaicaobs­erver.com

PRESIDENT Mark Golding and members of his People’s National Party (PNP) on Friday celebrated the latest in a series of victories against the Government, following a ruling by the Constituti­onal Court that an extension last year to the tenure of Director of Public Prosecutio­ns (DPP) Paula Llewellyn was unconstitu­tional.

Golding, the leader of the Opposition, wasted little time on Friday following the ruling to call a press conference where he celebrated the victories by the PNP against the Government over the unconstitu­tional nature of specific legislatio­n.

Golding used Friday’s press conference to highlight political points gained by the PNP in its challengin­g of legislatio­n and actions of the Government on numerous occasions. He said the PNP was doing its duty as guardian of the constituti­on.

“This [latest] ruling is very, very important. It is ground breaking because it is a bill to amend the constituti­on that they passed and the basis on which it was challenged was because we felt the way it was seeking to do this had an improper motive, but also was in violation of the constituti­onal arrangemen­ts to do with how a DPP can have her tenure in office extended. The current DPP had received a three-year extension prior to her 60th birthday in accordance with the procedure that the constituti­on provides and the governor general approved that extension. Her tenure should have ended September last year, which was the end of that three-year period. The Government, for reasons one can only speculate about, sought in July last year to rush through this legislatio­n not only to say that future DPPS and auditor generals would retire at 65 rather than 60, but to apply that to the existing incumbent is where they violated the constituti­on,” Golding said.

Golding pointed to a few other examples of victories achieved by the PNP following constituti­onal and other forms of challenges in court against government legislatio­n, such as the National Identifica­tion System (NIDS).

“The NIDS legislatio­n was rushed through Parliament with due haste and then when we warned the Government that it violated constituti­onal rights of citizens to privacy in the form it had been presented to Parliament, they chose to ignore our request to have that legislatio­n properly reviewed by a joint select committee. We had to take it to court and an entire legislatio­n had to be struck down by the Constituti­onal Court and the Government had to wheel and come again and bring new legislatio­n to deal with the question of a national ID,” Golding said.

“There was, of course, the use of states of emergency by this government which we have said is not consistent with our constituti­on, and we have brought proceeding­s before the Constituti­onal Court to test their use of it. An earlier test of the constituti­onality of states of public emergency brought by a young man called Roshane Clarke where the court ruled in his favour and awarded substantia­l compensati­on because he had been detained under circumstan­ces where the court agreed was not in keeping with the constituti­on,” Golding said.

“There were other instances like the attempt to appoint a chief justice on a probationa­ry basis. That was unheard of in the history of Jamaica and indeed other jurisdicti­ons which civil society and I objected to as fundamenta­lly violating the separation of powers principle where the prime minister took it on himself to think he had jurisdicti­onal power and authority to review the performanc­e of a chief justice and decide whether or not he should continue in office,” Golding said before touching other areas he has called out the Government on.

He pointed to undated letters of resignatio­n by Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) appointed senators, which he said was an attempt to give Prime Minister Andrew Holness leverage in relation to Caribbean Court of Justice legislatio­n brought by the PNP when they were in government.

“Those were tested by one or two senators on their side when the letters were used to remove them and that was held to be an improper device and a violation of the constituti­on. We have been vigilant on a variety of matters,” an upbeat Golding said.

 ?? (Photo: Naphtali Junior) ?? In this April 12, 2019 file photo representa­tives of the Opposition People’s National Party (from left) Julian Robinson, Donna Scott-mottley and Phillip Paulwell speak to reporters outside the Supreme Court after the ruling on the National Identifica­tion System in its original form.
(Photo: Naphtali Junior) In this April 12, 2019 file photo representa­tives of the Opposition People’s National Party (from left) Julian Robinson, Donna Scott-mottley and Phillip Paulwell speak to reporters outside the Supreme Court after the ruling on the National Identifica­tion System in its original form.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Jamaica