Jamaica Gleaner

COLUMN: Action needed to address Caribbean cybersecur­ity

- David Jessop is a consultant to the Caribbean Council. david.jessop@caribbeanc­ouncil.org

JUST OVER a week ago Google, Facebook, Amazon, Twitter, Netflix, Visa and many more premium providers of global web services temporaril­y went offline.

This was because they had indirectly suffered the effects of a Distribute­d Denial of Service (DDoS) attack on Dyn, a largely unknown intermedia­ry that enables web users to access the addresses of major websites.

Experts say that it may have been the biggest DDoS attack ever mounted because it brought down a key gateway, and was highly sophistica­ted in the way in which it sent huge volumes of data, causing Dyn’s servers to deny access to its clients.

What was unusual was that the event in part was delivered through unsecured smart devices – the so-called Internet of things – including everyday items linked to the Internet like webcams, baby monitors, smart TVs and DVD players, and even fridges and central heating systems.

Apart from indicating an absence of serious thinking about security by those who design and sell such web-linked products and regulation­s to govern them, it demonstrat­ed that it is now possible to indirectly shut down or disrupt essential online services.

WIDESPREAD ATTACKS

Reports in the trade press suggest that so serious have DDoS attacks in general become that more than 30 per cent are now large enough to swamp almost any business or poorly protected government.

While few Caribbean cases of DDoS or cybercrime ever become public, because of the perceived reputation­al damage, there are ample reports of the existence of cyberattac­ks, including theft from banks; the hacking of government websites In this January 28, 2015 file photo, then state minister for technology Julian Robinson discusses Jamaica’s cybersecur­ity strategy with Organizati­on of American States Cybersecur­ity Policy Specialist Kerry-Ann Barrett at the launch of a cybersecur­ity campaign in Kingston. Personal internet connected devices have been proved vulnerable to hacking, making cybersecur­ity an even more urgent issue for the Caribbean.

in the Bahamas and St Vincent by a group claiming to be supporters of ISIS; ransomware attacks on some Caribbean tax authoritie­s; and most recently, the publicatio­n online in interrogat­able form of 1.3 million files from the Bahamas’ corporate registry.

These revealed not just the lack of appropriat­e security within government portals, but the existence of outmoded IT systems and software with the potential, some experts suggest, to have compromise­d government­s’ internal communicat­ions. They also highlighte­d the region’s

vulnerabil­ity and the absence of local expertise or financial resource to address weaknesses, leaving others to be invited in to provide the necessary technical support and to remedy problems.

According to a joint study by the Center for Strategic Studies and McAfee published earlier this year, Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) has become a new frontier for cyberattac­ks and crime at an estimated cost of around US$90 billion per year.

The Cipher Brief, a digital, security-based platform that connects the private sector with the world’s leading security experts, recently noted that 12 per cent of DDoS attacks now target the LAC region and that the number is escalating. It is also the case that there has

been a dramatic rise in the number of people, including tourists, with access to Internet-connected devices, potentiall­y increasing national vulnerabil­ities.

Experts suggest that attacks will increasing­ly be directed at softer targets in locations through which funds flow for tax advantage or commercial expediency, and where tourism has become central to the stability of a national or regional economy.

While some Caribbean government­s and companies have begun to recognise the threat, strikingly not enough money or time is being spent on upgrading, protecting or testing systems related to essential infrastruc­ture, government

services, banking and financial services, private-sector operations, or on securing media sites.

In addition, according to the OAS/IDB report, mistrust and an absence of authoritat­ive informatio­n on best practices has led to an unwillingn­ess to designate individual­s in the police or military as coordinato­rs of cybersecur­ity policy developmen­t, or to build public-private partnershi­ps that might finance and build cybersecur­ity regimes.

As with so many matters in the Caribbean, the challenge is not in understand­ing the nature of the threat, but with implementa­tion.

Although government­s and a number of internatio­nal agencies meeting in St Lucia in March signed off on action plan to strengthen regional cooperatio­n in areas such as training, legislatio­n, technical capacity and law enforcemen­t, since then progress has been slow.

To understand the scale of the problems that need to be addressed, one only has to read the country-by-country reports in Cybersecur­ity: Are We Ready in Latin America and the Caribbean jointly published earlier this year by the Organisati­on of American States (OAS) and the InterAmeri­can Developmen­t Bank (IDB).

It makes clear that almost all countries in the region have no overall strategy, few relevant laws, and no genuine capacity to respond to a cyberattac­k.

ONLY ONE PREPARED

It suggests that the only country in the anglophone Caribbean that is well prepared is Trinidad, with Jamaica not far behind. It notes that while Antigua, The Bahamas, Dominica, Haiti, and Suriname are ‘in the process of articulati­ng a potential strategy’, there is no indication when they will have in place the essential components.

As for the rest of CARICOM, the report suggests that evidence of progress is scant.

In the Hispanic Caribbean, surprising­ly, even the Dominican Republic, which is heavily dependent on connectivi­ty, was deemed to be poorly prepared. In contrast, although not covered by the study, Cuba is well equipped. Having establishe­d the Universida­d de las Ciencias Informatic­as (UCI) in 2002, it now has some 14,000 graduates working in all areas of government and enterprise and is consequent­ly understood to have advanced cyber-defence measures in place.

Unfortunat­ely, there is a view in parts of the region that the Caribbean is somehow immune or unlikely to be of interest to cybercrimi­nals, however, one only has to consider the enormous sums of money transferre­d regularly through the region’s offshore financial centres, the commercial­ly sensitive documents held in registries and lawyers’ offices, matters of national security and criminalit­y that all government­s regularly engage with, the expansion of citizenshi­p programmes, and the millions of daily commercial banking transactio­ns to immediatel­y see the dangers cybercrime poses to small nations.

The Caribbean and Latin America have a small window in which to develop strong and integrated cybersecur­ity networks before attackers begin to seriously explore and infiltrate what is still a largely undefended region.

As The Cipher Brief puts it: “The question is whether government­s have the political will, private industry is open to working with the public sector, and citizens start taking responsibi­lity for their own cyber security.”

I

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? David Jessop
THE VIEW FROM EUROPE
David Jessop THE VIEW FROM EUROPE

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Jamaica