Jamaica Gleaner

UWI researcher investigat­ing the effects of wireless device use on human health

-

DR LOUISRAY Harris, lecturer in the Department of Physics, UWI, Mona, has been conducting investigat­ions on the effects of wireless devices on human health.

Harris’ background is in wireless communicat­ions, and his current research is a followup to his PhD thesis which involved applying a largescale numerical estimation method to radiowave propagatio­n in large and complex indoor environmen­ts, as well as subsequent research that focused on the simultaneo­us use of devices such as cellphones and tablets, and their effects on the human body.

“My focus in this study is on the effects of wireless devices on the brain as the phone is a device that is used closest to the brain,” he told UWIMONA Now.

“From studies done worldwide, it is accepted that there is some relationsh­ip between electromag­netic (EM) radiation and heating. The signals transmitte­d by antennas in the phone are absorbed by tissues in the body, and this can have a heating effect on those tissues. So the concern has been whether or not the heating effect is linked to the formation of tumours in the brain,” Harris said.

His study focuses on the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), which tells how much power from the EM radiation is absorbed per kilogramme of the body.

“Different phones and wireless devices have different SAR values. There are guidelines that dictate the maximum SAR a device should have, both for the US and EU markets. The guidelines place a restrictio­n on the manufactur­ers of wireless devices to ensure that their devices comply with the respective limits,” he said.

In addition, he pointed out that the Internatio­nal Commission for NonIonisin­g Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) also issued guidelines setting out the maximum allowable SAR values for wireless devices “to prevent excessive localised heating of human tissues”.

For his study, Harris used specialise­d software to do various simulation­s involving placing wireless devices at different positions around the body, and the software calculated the SAR values for different configurat­ions. For the different configurat­ions that were simulated, comparison­s were made of the SAR values with the guidelines issued by the ICNIRP.

“The point of the study is to objectivel­y investigat­e and model realistic scenarios and see what the results tell us. The results have shown that for the specific configurat­ions that have been modelled to date, the SAR values are less than those recommende­d by the ICNIRP,” he said.

Neverthele­ss, Harris underscore­d the need for vigilance among consumers, noting that newer models of phones with higher SARs are constantly being developed. He said children were particular­ly vulnerable as the average child is exposed to a lot more EM radiation than before, especially given the increased mobile usage.

“More children are now using phones, and as their brains are not as developed as those of adults, the brain tissue is softer and there is greater absorption of the EM radiation,” he explained.

“What researcher­s have been trying to find out is what condition of EM radiation would result in adverse effects on human health. The compositio­n of the tissue, the strength of the signal, the distance between the device and the tissue, as well as the duration of calls are all factors that contribute to increased absorption,” he added.

Harris plans to continue additional studies using different configurat­ions and different environmen­ts to effectivel­y determine the SAR. “I will be doing further studies with different configurat­ions of devices. Based on my analysis of the data I already have, the threshold by the ICNIRP was not exceeded for these cases, and the test devices are within the ICNIRP limits. Tests have shown that the configurat­ions of these devices used in the study are not harmful to human health,” he said.

However, Harris will be examining various other wireless devices to determine whether or not their use in different configurat­ions would be harmful to human health. “This includes other nonphone devices that are used near the brain or clipped to the waist, wearable devices such as watches, devices attached to clothes, and eyeglasses that have wireless capabiliti­es,” he said.

According to Harris, it is also important for people to be aware of the SAR values of their cellphones and tablet devices, which are usually included in the manual or on the manufactur­ers’ websites. All wireless devices should have SAR values that are less than the limits of 1.6 W/kg (US) and 2 W/kg (Europe). People should also limit the duration of calls where the phone is at the head for long periods, or use handsfree headsets.

 ??  ?? Figure 2 – The left image shows a top view of the electric field strength generated by a wireless transmitte­r in the region of a human head model. The right image shows the correspond­ing degree of absorption (SAR) of electromag­netic radiation by the...
Figure 2 – The left image shows a top view of the electric field strength generated by a wireless transmitte­r in the region of a human head model. The right image shows the correspond­ing degree of absorption (SAR) of electromag­netic radiation by the...
 ??  ?? Figure 1 – Dr Harris explains a point using a computerge­nerated model that shows the absorption of electromag­netic radiation inside the head when a cellphone is close to the ear.
Figure 1 – Dr Harris explains a point using a computerge­nerated model that shows the absorption of electromag­netic radiation inside the head when a cellphone is close to the ear.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Jamaica