Jamaica Gleaner

“Notwithsta­nding the indisputab­le ubiquity of sexual harassment within the society, Jamaica has yet to enact comprehens­ive legislatio­n to address it,” says Amanda Quest as she urges ‘Prioritise Sex Harassment Bill’.

- Amanda Quest Guest Columnist Amanda Quest is a law student and freelance researcher. Email feedback to columns@gleanerjm.com and questamand­a@hotmail.com.

SINCE THE tabling of the Sexual Harassment Bill by then Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller almost three years ago, it appears to have fallen far off the legislativ­e agenda. Whatever the reasons for the protracted delay in the retabling and passage of the Sexual Harassment Bill, such a state of affairs is deeply disappoint­ing as it betrays a shocking indifferen­ce to the gravity of an issue that has, for far too long, plagued the Jamaican society.

In recent times – and perhaps emboldened by the force of local, regional, and internatio­nal activist movements against sexual violence – scores of women have courageous­ly shared their experience­s with sexual harassment in employment and other contexts. They have told of being propositio­ned for sexual favours or of having humiliatin­g sexual overtures made to them by superiors and co-workers alike, which had disastrous effects on their self-esteem, productivi­ty, and sense of security.

Unsurprisi­ngly, many chose not to complain about these incidents for fear of being profession­ally sabotaged, blackliste­d, or otherwise penalised for doing so, especially in circumstan­ces where, as was oftentimes the case, their harasser(s) wielded considerab­le power and influence. Eventually, their productivi­ty, health, and overall wellbeing would become so seriously compromise­d by the interminab­le harassment they experience­d that they felt compelled to leave their jobs.

UBIQUITY OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT

Notwithsta­nding the indisputab­le ubiquity of sexual harassment within the society, Jamaica has yet to enact comprehens­ive legislatio­n to address it. In 1997, the CARICOM Secretaria­t drafted ‘model’ legislatio­n on sexual harassment, which was to guide member states in the drafting and implementa­tion of their own legislatio­n. To date, however, only five member states have taken some legislativ­e action to treat with the issue.

CARICOM member states such as Guyana and St Lucia, for example, have sought to address the issue through antidiscri­mination legislatio­n; Belize and Barbados through standalone legislatio­n; and The Bahamas through sexual offences legislatio­n.

Jamaica, therefore, lags considerab­ly far behind its regional counterpar­ts having failed – despite numerous undertakin­gs successive government­s for about a decade now – to take any legislativ­e action to tackle the issue.

HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIO­NS

In convention­al discourses on sexual harassment, it has generally been conceptual­ised as a health-labour issue owing largely to its pernicious effects on the health, safety, and productivi­ty of its victims (who are predominan­tly women). Seldom has sexual harassment been framed, within this context, as a human-rights issue even though it seriously undermines a victim’s dignity, bodily integrity, and fundamenta­l human rights.

Internatio­nal and regional human-rights instrument­s such as the Convention on the Eliminatio­n of all Forms of Violence against Women (CEDAW) and the InterAmeri­can Convention on the Prevention, Punishment and Eradicatio­n of Violence against Women (Belem Do Para Convention) recognise sexual harassment as both a form of discrimina­tion and gender-based violence against women, which constrains their enjoyment of a number of guaranteed fundamenta­l human rights. These include, among others, the right to life, health, equality, just and favourable conditions of work and security.

But quite apart from that, sexual harassment also acts as an impediment to the realisatio­n of substantiv­e equality between men and women at work. On this point, the CEDAW Committee, which monitors the implementa­tion of CEDAW, has observed that gender equality in employment can be subverted when women are subjected to sexual harassment and other forms of gender-specific violence.

By ratifying CEDAW and the Belem Do Para Convention – in 1984 and 2005, respective­ly – Jamaica has committed to eliminatin­g all forms of gender-based violence and discrimina­tion against women. It is, therefore, obliged to take the necessary legislativ­e and other measures to eradicate the scourge of sexual harassment, which persists unabated within the society.

Accordingl­y, prioritisi­ng and promulgati­ng the Sexual Harassment Bill will not only see Jamaica acting in compliance with its regional and internatio­nal human rights obligation­s, but will also compelling­ly communicat­e the seriousnes­s of the issue, provide effective remedies for victims of sexual harassment, and critically delineate – through a holistic and nuanced definition of the proscribed conduct – what is appropriat­e behaviour and what is not in employment and other contexts.

Equally as important, for the first time ever, the experience­s of victims of sexual harassment - who have long been made to suffer this indignity in silence – would now be legally recognised and validated, thereby empowering them to more readily report incidents of sexual harassment and seek redress for the damage or harm caused.

While prioritisi­ng and passing the Sexual Harassment Bill will not be a panacea, it will be a progressiv­e and long-overdue step towards ensuring that the human rights of all persons, especially those who are most vulnerable, are effectivel­y safeguarde­d in the workplace and beyond.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Jamaica