Causes of emancipation – The end of chattel slavery in the British Caribbean
HI, GUYS, this week’s lesson focuses on the factors that accounted for the end of the system of chattel slavery in the British Caribbean. Objectives: At the end of the lesson, you should be able to:
1. Discuss four causes of emancipation.
AGITATION BY THE ENSLAVED POPULATION
The action of the slaves proved integral in the dismantling of chattel slavery in the British Caribbean. Insurrectionary methods of resistance, especially revolts, demonstrated the desire of the enslaved Africans to have liberty and regain their personhood. Several revolts in the British Caribbean included Tacky’s Rebellion, Bussa’s Revolt and the Berbice Rebellion. The last major slave revolt before emancipation was the Sam Sharpe Rebellion, or Christmas Rebellion.
Sam Sharpe, a slave and Baptist deacon, believed that the British Parliament would emancipate the slaves soon and that the planters would try to find ways of keeping their unpaid force labour. Sharpe was a literate slave and oftentimes read his master’s newspaper. He led a strike soon after the Christmas holidays, as slaves decided they would not work unless they were paid wages. The strikes that began relatively quiet would later erupt, as cane fields and estates were burnt and other property destroyed. Over 400 slaves were killed and 100, including Sharpe, were executed. The Christmas Rebellion proved symbolic as it demonstrated the thrust by enslaved Africans to continue their fight for liberty. The rebellion was also the largest and most widescale of slave revolts in the British Caribbean.
ROLE OF THE HUMANITARIANS
Several groups of humanitarians worked hard to improve the conditions of slaves and, ultimately, to lobby for the end of slavery. They tried to convince the British Parliament and the citizenry of the immorality of slavery. They held mock slave auctions, displayed exhibits of items used to punish slaves, as well as distributed pamphlets describing the horrors of slavery. These actions were hoped to arouse the moral conscience of the British citizenry. Prominent humanitarians included Granville Sharp, William Wilberforce and Thomas Clarkson. These men were a part of a group called the ‘Saints’ or ‘Clapham Sect’. Other groups involved in the abolitionist cause were the Baptists, Quakers and Methodists.
THE FAILURE OF THE AMELIORATION SYSTEM
This system was an attempt to improve the conditions faced by the enslaved Africans in the British Caribbean and should have been enacted by local assemblies. The system came into effect in 1823. The proposals included the following:
A record of all lashes should be kept and punishment should be delayed for 24 hours.
There should be the establishment of slave savings bank.
The separation of slave families is prohibited.
Slaves should not be sold in payment of debt.
Female slaves should not be whipped, and the overseers and drivers should not carry a whip in the fields.
The measures were strongly resisted by planters in Jamaica, Barbados, St Vincent and Dominica. Several assemblies only passed a few of the least important amelioration proposals. The amelioration proposals failed, but they provided one of the major impetuses for the abolition of chattel slavery. With the failure of the plantocracy to implement many of these amelioration proposals, it became evident that what was needed was freedom for the enslaved Africans.
MANSFIELD JUDGMENT
This judgement provided a watershed moment for humanitarians as it brought into sharp focus the discussion on whether or not slavery was legal in England. In 1772, Granville Sharp, a leading abolitionist, took the case of James Somerset to the English courts. Somerset, an enslaved man from Jamaica, was taken to England by his owner. He was turned out by his master, but later he [his master] would make attempts to regain his ‘property’. Somerset’s case came before Chief Justice Lord Mansfield on February 7, 1772. After careful deliberations, Mansfield provided a ruling in June of that year. Lord Mansfield ruled that his study of the laws of England found that the power of a master to use force on a slave was ‘unknown to the laws of England’. What was the implication of such a ruling in England?
ECONOMIC MOTIVE – THE EAST INDIA INTEREST
The growth of the British Empire in India led to the growth of a powerful ‘East India Interest’ in British politics. These individuals were primarily merchants and industrialists who objected to the favoured treatment given to the West Indian (British Caribbean) interest for two reasons. One was that goods such as tea and cotton produced in India were done with the use of free labour instead of slave labour used in the British Caribbean. The other was that protectionism was still being practised in relation to the Caribbean – giving their sugar preferential treatment in the British market. The East India Interest argued against slave labour, describing it is an expensive and inefficient use of labour. They also argued that Britain as a part of her industrial development should move from a system of protectionism to one of free trade. With several prominent figures of the East India Interest gaining parliamentary seats in the 1832 elections, the process of defeating the West India interest and chattel slavery became less arduous. Debbion Hyman is an independent contributor. Send comments to kerryann.hepburn@gleanerjm.com