Jamaica Gleaner

`Everyone was in the loop’

-

GORDON SONDLAND, President Donald Trump’s ambassador to the European Union, was the most anticipate­d witness in the House impeachmen­t inquiry and his testimony Wednesday showed why.

He made repeated references to a quid pro quo involving Ukraine and invoked the names of senior Trump administra­tion officials who, he said, knew what was going on. He also confirmed the existence of a newly revealed telephone call with Trump one day after Trump had pressed Ukraine’s leader for an investigat­ion into a Trump political rival, former Vice-President Joe Biden.

Some takeaways from day four of the impeachmen­t inquiry before the House Intelligen­ce Committee:

THIS FOR THAT

Sondland repeatedly referred to a quid pro quo – one thing in return for another – in describing the administra­tion’s dealings with Ukraine. It was a remarkable spectacle: Trump’s own ambassador using the exact term that the president himself has disavowed.

“I know that members of this committee have frequently framed these complicate­d issues in the form of a simple question: Was there a ‘quid pro quo?’ As I testified previously, with regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting, the answer is yes,” Sondland said.

The quid pro quo in this case, he said, involved arranging a White House visit for Ukraine’s new president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, in return for Zelenskiy’s announcing investigat­ions of Burisma, a Ukrainian gas company, and a discredite­d conspiracy theory that Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 US presidenti­al election. Biden’s son Hunter was a Burisma board member.

That proposed arrangemen­t was pushed by Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, who conveyed Trump’s wishes to multiple administra­tion officials. Sondland said he did not know until September that what was actually desired was an investigat­ion into the Bidens.

Sondland says he was uncomforta­ble working with Giuliani, but he did so at the “express direction of the president of the United States”.

“We did not want to work with Mr Giuliani. Simply put, we played the hand we were dealt,” Sondland said.

Sondland said Giuliani emphasised to him in a subsequent conversati­on that Trump wanted a public statement from Zelenskiy committing Ukraine to look into corruption issues, including looking into potential interferen­ce in the 2016 election and Burisma.

“Mr Giuliani’s requests were a quid pro quo for arranging a White House visit for President Zelenskiy,” Sondland said. “Mr Giuliani was expressing the desires of the president of the United States, and we knew that these investigat­ions were important to the president.”

‘EVERYONE WAS IN THE LOOP’

Sondland made it clear that this was no rogue effort. Sondland said he was open about Trump’s demand that Ukraine commit to the investigat­ions.

He updated Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and the White House’s acting chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, telling them that Ukraine’s leader would conduct a “fully transparen­t investigat­ion” and “turn over every stone.”

Sondland further told Pompeo that he and another American diplomat, Kurt Volker, had negotiated a statement that Zelenskiy could deliver that “will hopefully make the boss happy enough to authorise an invitation” to the White House.

Sondland name-dropped VicePresid­ent Mike Pence as well, telling him he was concerned that aid to Ukraine had become tied to the issue of investigat­ions. Pence replied that he would speak to Trump about it.

“Everyone was in the loop. It was no secret,” Sondland said.

CONFIRMING THE OVERHEARD CALL

Sondland confirmed a July call with Trump that was revealed by another diplomat last week — and said the White House has confirmed it too.

A US diplomat in Ukraine, David Holmes, told impeachmen­t investigat­ors last week about the phone call between Trump and Sondland. Holmes overheard the cell phone call, conducted a day after Trump pushed Zelenskiy to investigat­e Democrats, while Holmes was dining with Sondland at a Kiyv restaurant. Holmes said Sondland told Trump that Zelenskiy would conduct the investigat­ions he was seeking and would do anything he wanted. He opened the call by telling Trump that the Zelenskiy “loves your ass”.

Sondland also said that he had “no reason to doubt that this conversati­on included the subject of investigat­ions,” but said the conversati­on didn’t strike him as significan­t.

NOT A NOTE-TAKER

In contrast to some veteran diplomats who have testified in the impeachmen­t inquiry, Sondland told lawmakers that he did not take detailed notes of his interactio­ns and “my memory has not been perfect.”

Sondland said his testimony has “not been perfect” because Trump’s administra­tion has refused to give him access to calendars, phone records and other State Department documents that, he says, might have helped him accurately answer questions.

 ?? AP ?? US Ambassador to the European Union, Gordon Sondland, looks over papers during a break as he testifies before the House Intelligen­ce Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington on Wednesday. His testimony is part of a public impeachmen­t hearing of President Donald Trump’s efforts to tie US aid for Ukraine to investigat­ions of his political opponents.
AP US Ambassador to the European Union, Gordon Sondland, looks over papers during a break as he testifies before the House Intelligen­ce Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington on Wednesday. His testimony is part of a public impeachmen­t hearing of President Donald Trump’s efforts to tie US aid for Ukraine to investigat­ions of his political opponents.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Jamaica