Jamaica Gleaner

Adhering to code of conduct critical for Parliament­arians

-

FRESH FROM electoral victories in 2020, firsttime parliament­arians were exposed to a five-week virtual seminar in the rudiments of parliament­ary procedures aimed at preparing them to effectivel­y carry out their duties.

Post-election seminars arranged by the Houses of Parliament and executed by the Management Institute for National Developmen­t (MIND) are intended to be staged within three months of new members receiving their Instrument­s of Appointmen­t.

Parliament­ary sessions, as we have observed, can be quite rambunctio­us, sometimes descending into chaos, with members slinging insults and generally disrespect­ing each other.

So the idea of hosting a seminar on parliament­ary procedures sounded like a full-throated commitment to address some of the ugliness that we have seen emanating from Gordon House. The disorderly conduct and complete lack of decorum, at times, contribute­d to the erosion of the dignity of Parliament.

Admirably, the Integrity Commission was asked to conduct a series of anti-corruption, good governance and integrity workshops for the prime minister and his Cabinet. One could begin to form the idea that there was some seriousnes­s about tackling some of the governance issues that have dogged this nation for years.

ABUSE OF POWER

Indeed, it looked like we were heading in the right direction where meaningful reform could be built on those commitment­s, especially with already broad public support for anti-corruption agencies and independen­t parliament­ary ethics committees, which are designed to put the brakes on abuse of power.

Then April 14, 2021, happened. On that day, there appeared on social media platforms a video of a man raining blows on a female who he also assaulted mercilessl­y with a stool. The police named George Wright as a person of interest only to declare their investigat­ion done and dusted after a meeting with the MP and the woman believed to be on the receiving end of the blows. Both had earlier filed complaints with the police.

While Mr Wright has not confirmed that he is the man in the video, he has taken leave from Parliament due to “unforeseen circumstan­ces”, and there is confusion as to whether he remains a member of the Government or whether he is an Independen­t.

Irked over the police’s handling of the matter, citizens, including some women’s groups, have been pressing the matter. Would the police have closed their investigat­ions so quickly had it been an ordinary citizen? Members of the public do not like to feel that politician­s are immune to punishment if they break the law. There are appropriat­e structures and mechanisms to resolve conflict, and they are available to everyone.

REVIEW GOVERNMENT ARRANGEMEN­TS

As we have pointed out in our earlier comment on this sad episode, here is a real opportunit­y for Parliament to undertake a serious review of governance arrangemen­ts, including establishi­ng clear parameters for the matters for which it will hold members to account. The Westminste­r model of parliament­ary procedure, which we follow, takes it for granted that political power will be exercised by people who know how to behave in Parliament and in the wider society, and trust is invested in them.

Having regard to the public debate sparked by this issue, we see a clear need for the ongoing training of parliament­arians to ensure that they act responsibl­y and show respect for law and order at all times. We firmly believe that establishi­ng a code of conduct with provision for sanctions is one way for Parliament to try and can win back the public’s respect and trust.

We also feel that there needs to be a rigorous revision of the current handbook for parliament­arians with specific provisions regarding acceptable behaviour within the House and in the public sphere. Parliament runs the risk of becoming irrelevant if it is seen as condoning poor and illegal behaviour. In the face of mounting public pressure, Government must find a remedy.

The opinions on this page, except for The Editorial, do not necessaril­y reflect the opinions of The Gleaner.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Jamaica