The Korea Times

Nudging your karma

- Jason Lim Jason Lim (jasonlim@msn.com) is a Washington, D.C.-based expert on innovation, leadership and organizati­onal culture. He has been writing for The Korea Times since 2006.

The central narrative of the 2008 financial crisis was that highly capable individual­s driven by rational self-interest made such bad decisions that they almost brought down the world’s financial infrastruc­ture and visited ruin upon themselves, not to mention the Main Street. But bad decision-making is not limited to powerful executives. From A-list celebritie­s to powerful politician­s, we have witnessed people make disastrous, self-destructiv­e decisions. For Exhibit A, look at what Harvey Weinstein has allegedly done in going from a legendary film producer to a sexual predator. I am sure that wasn’t the legacy that he wanted to leave behind, yet he engaged in actions that inevitably marched him off the cliff.

As behavioral scientists have already proven, human decisions are not driven by rational self-interest coldly maximizing utility and resources, as traditiona­l economics have taught us. Then, what really drives our decisions, many of which can be self-destructiv­e?

This was the question that ultimately won the 2017 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Science for Richard Thaler, one of the fathers of behavioral economics and a professor at the Booth School of Business at the University of Chicago.

Writing in the Atlantic, Derek Thompson describes Thaler’s work in the following: “In studies that borrowed from psychology, sociology, and plain-old curiosity, Thaler demonstrat­ed that mankind was afflicted by emotion and irrational­ity, which influences their decisionma­king on everything from retirement savings, to health-care policy, to profession­al sports. But Thaler didn’t contend that humans were randomly irrational. More importantl­y, he observed that people are predictabl­y irrational (to borrow a term from the economist Dan Ariely). Some of Thaler’s most interestin­g work studied the predictabl­y irrational effects of ownership, confidence, and a sense of fairness.”

Thaler is only partially correct. While much of our predictabl­e irrational­ity is inherited biological biases (as explained through evolutiona­ry psychology), we are also conditione­d to specific irrational­ities that are all our own.

Buddha, born more than 2,500 years ago, concluded that most human beings make decisions in such a manner that lead not to their happiness — their stated goal — but to discontent because they are not self-aware of what really drives their decision-making. Translated into modern vernacular, Buddha had essentiall­y observed that what really drives human decision-making is a complex and organic web of social context, cultural norms, genetic predisposi­tion, evolutiona­ry imprints, peer pressure, traumatic experience­s, and everything else that has had any influence in shaping us as human beings and individual­s. All these etch a deeply ingrained pattern of cognitive reflexes and automatic biases that make us decide how we decide, most often without even thinking.

He called this Karma. Sounds very much like the predictabl­e irrational­ity that Thaler described, except much more. Karma is the totality of what Buddha called the human being’s conditione­d existence that hijacks our decision-making without our awareness.

Going back to Thaler, his most interestin­g claim to fame is his support of “nudging” techniques to shape people’s behaviors. “If irrational human behavior can be predicted, then it can be incited, or nudged. Thaler coined the term “nudging” to describe cheap and easy interventi­ons that change people’s decision-making. The term can apply to both weighty and trivial causes, from encouragin­g savings by auto-enrolling employees in retirement plans to putting a housefly sticker in a men’s urinal to ‘improve aim.’”

Which brings us back to karma. Is it possible to nudge our karmas toward a direction that we desire? If karma is a deeply ingrained pattern of cognitive habits, then what are the nudging interventi­ons that we can do to reshape this pattern? More importantl­y, this would also represent an intentiona­l, conscious reshaping of who we are, rather than allow our conditioni­ng to make decisions on our behalf. We can take back our default state and own our lives.

On second thought, forget nudging. I want Thaler to come out with technique called, “push” or “kick ass.” I am waiting.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Korea, Republic