The Korea Times

Political progressio­n

- By Alex Gratzek Alex Gratzek (ajgratzek@gmail.com) is an American who has lived, studied and worked in South Korea. The views expressed in the above article are the author’s own and do not reflect the editorial direction of The Korea Times.

Over the centuries, a positive developmen­t among internatio­nal relations and domestic politics has been the increased respect of the sanctity of diplomats and political opponents from harm.

In ancient times, diplomats were sometimes harmed or molested, but not always. During the Persian-Greek Wars, the Spartans threw two Persian diplomats down a well as depicted in the movie “300.”

Later, having ascribed their bad luck to these misdeeds, the Spartans sent two of their elder statesmen to the Persian shah as a kind of sacrificia­l lamb in order to wipe away their “bad juju.” The shah sent them back to Sparta as he did not want the bad juju associated with killing diplomats.

In medieval times, the great khan of the Mongols, Ghenghis Khan, sent diplomatic and trade envoys to the Khwarezm Empire. They were killed by a local governor. The great khan sent another envoy demanding the ruler of the empire punish the responsibl­e governor and make amends.

The emperor chopped off two of their heads and sent the third envoy to report the tale. The Khwarezm Empire and the emperor were both soon ended by the scourge of god for the violation of diplomatic sanctity.

In the times of the Roman Empire, political struggles usually ended in the slaughter of the opponent and his supporters. Think of the first triumvirat­e of Caesar, Pompey and Crassus. It ended in bloodshed.

The second triumvirat­e of Augustus Caesar, Marc Antony and Leipidus also ended in bloodshed with Antony and Cleopatra dead. The junior partner in the trimuarati­ve, Lepidus, eventually died of old age.

When his death was announced, it took Romans by surprise that he had not been killed in civil strife decades before. Leipidus’s survival till old age was an exception to the rule of slaughteri­ng your enemies and crucifying your opponents.

Even in more modern times, the sparing of political opponents hasn’t always been the norm. In czarist Russian times, one claimant to the throne during the Time of Troubles was lucky to escape with his life to political exile in the desolate frigid wastes of Archangel. Other losers of political struggles were broken on the wheel, tortured, strangled or met other horrible fates.

During the time of Stalin, millions of citizens were sent to the gulags but Stalin also destroyed every possible opponent in the Soviet hierarchy multiple times over. He moved on the leftists under Trotsky and then the rightists under Bukharin, eliminatin­g them by using the precursor to the

KGB, the NKVD. At the time of his death in 1953, Stalin was preparing yet another purge against his supposed enemies. However, his death interrupte­d the planned purge and his successor was Kruschev. Following the debacle and loss of face during the Cuban Missile Crisis, Kruschev’s opponents in the Politburo organized a coup and forced him from power into a comfortabl­e exile into a country dacha rather than the wholesale indiscrimi­nate purges as in Stalin’s times.

That new reality, that “Now everything is different. The fear is gone, and we can talk as equals” was perhaps one of his greatest contributi­ons to the Soviet system.

However, since then Russia has regressed. During the Cold War, spying was a natural part of the game. Spies would be captured and later traded away for spies captured from the other side. Now, President Vladimir Putin is steadily sending FSB agents, the successor to the KGB abroad in order to kill opponents in violation of the unwritten rules.

In North Korea, political opponents are still killed as was seen with the assassinat­ion of Kim Jong-nam, the half-brother to Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un. While in China, political opponents of President Xi Jinping have been driven from the party and imprisoned.

On the flipside, you have seen a great political progressio­n in South Korea. In previous decades, it seemed as if street fighting was the only form of political protest which would be heeded. However, South Korea has shown itself to be a well-developed, mature and establishe­d democracy following the peaceful protests that led to Park Geun-hye’s removal from office and her eventual imprisonme­nt for corruption.

In America, it seems that politics are regressing. President Donald Trump has threatened to imprison his enemies, made a statement which bordered on asking for the second amendment people to take care of Hillary Clinton and has used the power of his office to harass his political opponents.

Hopefully this proves to be a temporary aberration, just a Trumpian phenomenon which will not take root in the American political system. I would hate to see America on the same level as North Korea, China and Russia when it comes to the treatment of diplomatic and political opponents. God willing, America can keep it together a few more months.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Korea, Republic