Arab Times

Experts fear non-pest insects are declining

Bye bye bugs?

-

Astaple of summer – swarms of bugs – seems to be a thing of the past. And that’s got scientists worried.

Pesky mosquitoes, disease-carrying ticks, cropmunchi­ng aphids and cockroache­s are doing just fine. But the more beneficial flying insects of summer – native bees, moths, butterflie­s, ladybugs, lovebugs, mayflies and fireflies – appear to be less abundant.

Scientists think something is amiss, but they can’t be certain: In the past, they didn’t systematic­ally count the population of flying insects, so they can’t make a proper comparison to today. Neverthele­ss, they’re pretty sure across the globe there are fewer insects that are crucial to as much as 80 percent of what we eat.

Yes, some insects are pests. But they also pollinate plants, are a key link in the food chain and help decompose life.

“You have total ecosystem collapse if you lose your insects. How much worse can it get than that?” said University of Delaware entomologi­st Doug Tallamy. If they disappeare­d, “the world

Wilson

By Seth Borenstein

would start to rot.”

He noted Harvard biologist E.O. Wilson once called bugs: “The little things that run the world.”

The 89-year-old Wilson recalled that he once frolicked in a “Washington alive with insects, especially butterflie­s.” Now, “the flying insects are virtually gone.”

Hit

It hit home last year when he drove from suburban Boston to Vermont and decided to count how many bugs hit his windshield. The result: A single moth.

The un-scientific experiment is called the windshield test. Wilson recommends everyday people do it themselves to see. Baby Boomers will probably notice the difference, Tallamy said.

Several scientists have conducted their own tests with windshield­s, car grilles and headlights, and most notice few squashed bugs. Researcher­s are quick to point out that such exercises aren’t good scientific experiment­s, since they don’t include control groups or make comparison­s with past results. (Today’s cars also are more aerodynami­c, so bugs are more likely to slip past them and live to buzz about it.)

Still, there are signs of decline. Research has shown dwindling individual species in specific places, including lightning bugs, moths and bumblebees. One study estimated a 14 percent decline in ladybugs in the United States and Canada from 1987 to 2006. University of Florida urban entomologi­st Philip Koehler said he’s seen a recent decrease in lovebugs – insects that fly connected and coated Florida’s windshield­s in the 1970s and 1980s. This year, he said, “was kind of disappoint­ing, I thought.”

University of Nevada, Reno, researcher Lee Dyer and his colleagues have been looking at insects at the La Selva Biological Station in Costa Rica since 1991. There’s a big insect trap sheet under black light that decades ago would be covered with bugs. Now, “there’s no insects on that sheet,” he said.

But there’s not much research looking at all flying insects in big areas.

Last year, a study that found an 82 percent midsummer decline in the number and weight of bugs captured in traps in 63 nature preserves in Germany compared with 27 years earlier. It was one of the few, if only, broad studies. Scientists say similar comparison­s can’t be done elsewhere because similar bug counts weren’t done decades ago.

“We don’t know how much we’re losing if we don’t know how much we have,” said University of Hawaii entomologi­st Helen Spafford.

The lack of older data makes it “unclear to what degree we’re experienci­ng an arthropoca­lypse,” said University of Illinois entomologi­st May Berenbaum. Individual studies aren’t convincing in themselves, “but the sheer accumulate­d weight of evidence seems to be shifting” to show a problem, she said. (AP)

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Kuwait