Kuwait Times

New Jersey Transit’s longest delay: Modern safety technology

-

Six years after New Jersey Transit won federal approval to install modern safety technology on its commuter rail lines, the project has languished and trains still operate with speed controls developed in the 1950s.

The technologi­cal divide was underscore­d last month when a packed NJ Transit train sped to double the 10 mph speed limit and hurdled into Hoboken Terminal, killing a woman on the platform and injuring more than 100 other people.

Instead of a sophistica­ted on-board computer regulating train speeds into the station, NJ Transit relies on an antiquated in-cab signaling system that’s designed to alert engineers and stop trains only when they go faster than 20 mph.

Even at Hoboken Terminal - where NJ Transit had an exception from positivetr­ain control requiremen­ts - experts say an on-board computer tied to the PTC system still would have worked to keep the train within the speed limit.

The Sept. 29 crash and other safety concerns - including an Associated Press analysis showing NJ Transit had more accidents than any other commuter railroad in the country in the past five years - has raised criticism of the transit agency and lawmakers in Trenton are holding a hearing on Friday to begin asking questions.

157 accidents since 2011

Trains run by NJ Transit, which operates the nation’s second-largest commuter railroad, have been involved in 157 accidents since the start of 2011, three times as many as the largest, the Long Island Rail Road, according to an AP analysis of data from January 2011 through July 2016.

“When I see 57 percent of accidents are attributed to human error, to me that’s indicative of an organizati­onal problem,” said state Sen. Bob Gordon, a Bergen County Democrat. “There’s something wrong with the culture, the safety culture. That may necessitat­e wholesale changes.”

NJ Transit’s sluggishne­ss on PTC is also expected to be a focus of Friday’s hearing, with lawmakers looking to compare the agency’s progress with that of other commuter railroads. The Southeaste­rn Pennsylvan­ia Transporta­tion Authority, which serves Philadelph­ia and its suburbs, has PTC functionin­g on 8 of its 13 branches. NJ Transit said in a June filing that it hasn’t made any additional progress as a December 2018 deadline looms.

NJ Transit did not respond to a request for comment. The railroad industry has said installing PTC at train terminals like the one in Hoboken is impractica­l and cumbersome, given the high volume of trains arriving and departing at what are normally low speeds, as well as the multitude of signals and other infrastruc­ture already in place.

“Although low-speed collisions do occasional­ly occur in these environmen­ts, the consequenc­es are low; and the rate of occurrence is very low in relation to the exposure,” the Federal Railroad Administra­tion stated in a 2010 regulatory filing on positive-train control.

Investigat­ors say the engineer on the Hoboken train hit the emergency brake when the train hit 21 mph, seconds before crashing into and then over a bumping post. Investigat­ors are looking into whether the alert system kicked in. It’s unclear if it would have slowed the train in time.

Under Federal Railroad Administra­tion rules, the maximum authorized speed for areas exempt from positive-train control is 20 mph. NJ Transit, in its implementa­tion plan, said that the maximum authorized speed at Hoboken Terminal is 15 mph.

That’s still too fast, David Schanoes, a former superinten­dent at New York’s Grand Central Terminal, said. He says cutting the speed to 10 mph would significan­tly reduce the risk of another Hoboken-type crash because it would give engineers far more time to slow, stop - or be alerted to stop - before crashing.

In the event of a crash, Schanoes said, a train going 10 mph would produce onequarter of the force of one traveling 20 mph. “In terms of lowering speeds within a terminal that’s certainly an option,” said Federal Railroad Administra­tor Sarah Feinberg. “We will look at anything that we can across the board to improve safety anywhere.”

 ?? —AP ?? HOBOKEN, NEW JERSEY: This Oct. 1, 2016, file photo provided by the National Transporta­tion Safety Board shows damage done to the Hoboken Terminal.
—AP HOBOKEN, NEW JERSEY: This Oct. 1, 2016, file photo provided by the National Transporta­tion Safety Board shows damage done to the Hoboken Terminal.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Kuwait