With Trump at helm, US takes its seat at UN rights council
Trump’s international agenda remains murky
GENEVA: The US claimed its seat yesterday on the Human Rights Council under the new presidency of Donald Trump, whose election has provoked deep concern over the body’s future. Over its 11-year history, the council has come in for criticism, including allegations that it has, at times, been co-opted by rights abusers who push resolutions attacking their geopolitical rivals, with genuine rights issues marginalized.
But the 47-member panel has had successes-thanks to support from Barack Obama’s administration which held a seat on the council for most of his eight-year term, civil society groups say. Many of the issues prioritized by Obama’s UN envoys-including violations in North Korea, Myanmar, Sri Lanka and South Sudan-remain on the agenda. In a keynote address, United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres warned that the world was facing “a time of urgency” and that the council was needed more than ever.
“Disregard for human rights is a disease, and it is a disease that is spreading,” he said. “The Human Rights Council must be part of the cure.” Trump’s State Department has not yet named an envoy to the body and was represented at yesterday’s session by veteran foreign service officer Erin Barclay.
Withdrawal over Israel?
Trump’s international agenda remains murky but rights advocates have warned that the early signs do not bode well for either the council or the broader human rights agenda.
“Clearly ‘America First’ does not suggest an approach that (prioritises) multilateral engagement,” said John Fisher of Human Rights Watch (HRW) in Geneva, referring to Trump’s foreign policy doctrine.
HRW also reacted to media reports that the US was considering quitting the council-before its term expires in 2019 — over the body’s treatment of Israel. “A decision by the United States to withdraw from the UN Human Rights Council over its criticism of Israeli policy and its overall effectiveness would be a misguided and shortsighted step,” the group’s UN director Louis Charbonneau said in a statement.
Pro-Israel groups have repeatedly noted that the Jewish state has been targeted by more rights council resolutions than any other nation. Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas, who addressed the opening session, said his people’s issue would be a “litmus test” for the council’s effectiveness. Assuming the US keeps its seat, there is “significant concern” about Washington’s capacity to take a leadership role based on Trump’s early moves, according to Fisher.
“When the administration has issued an executive order that bans travel from seven mainly-Muslim countries it erodes the US’ moral credibility and ability to engage in initiatives around the UN,” Fisher told AFP. Trump’s travel ban has been blocked in court. For UN rights chief Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, nations have a duty to resist “political actors ... (who) threaten the multilateral system or intend to withdraw from parts of it”. “Our rights, the rights of others, the very future of our planet cannot, must not be thrown aside by these reckless political profiteers,” Zeid said in his opening speech.
Decisive influence
The precursor to the rights council was the UN Commission on Human Rights, a body deemed so dysfunctional that former UN secretary general Kofi Annan scrapped it. When the new council was born in 2006, the US administration of George W. Bush did not fight for a seat or meaningfully engage, according to a January report from the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) think-tank.
The early years saw countries like Algeria, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia controlling the council, the CFR said, arguing that things began to turn when Obama’s administration secured a seat in 2009. The US began “to chip away at the council’s deficiencies while strengthening its capacity as a credible international human rights institution,” it said.