Trump rep rules out US return to TPP
Pacific Rim nations fight to save TPP trade pact
Japan and other members of the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreed yesterday to pursue their trade deal without the United States, as the Trump administration’s “America First” policy created tension at a meeting of Asia-Pacific countries.
Turmoil over global trade negotiations was laid bare at a meeting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum, which failed to agree on its usual joint statement after US opposition to wording on free trade and fighting protectionism.
The 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership covered 40 percent of the global economy before Trump abruptly abandoned it in January to meet a campaign pledge to save American jobs which he says have been sucked up overseas.
Japan, Australia and New Zealand are leading efforts by the so-called TPP 11 to resuscitate the agreement, convinced it will lock in future free trade and strengthen labor rights and environmental protections.
Trade representatives agreed to help the United States to rejoin the deal at any time, pinning hopes on a U-turn in American policy. The TPP was in part crafted as a counterweight to the burgeoning economic might of China. But Trump’s newly-appointed trade chief Robert Lighthizer poured cold water on the prospect of a US return, saying Washington “pulled out of the TPP and it’s not going to change that decision”.
“The TPP 11 can make their own decisions, the United States makes its decisions, that’s what sovereign nations do,” Lighthizer told reporters, adding his nation will “stay engaged” in the area, albeit on a bilateral basis.
The meeting in Hanoi, Vietnam, was the biggest global trade gathering since US President Donald Trump upended the old order, arguing that multilateral free-trade agreements were costing American jobs and that he wanted to cut new deals. On the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific meeting, the 11 remaining countries of the TPP agreed to explore how they could move ahead without erstwhile leader the United States - partly in the hope that Washington would reconsider leaving.
New US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer said there was no way back. “I believe at some point there will be a series of bilateral agreements with partners in this part of the world,” the 69-year-old Reagan-era trade negotiator told a news conference. “Bilateral negotiations are better for the United States.”
Although the TPP members kept the trade agreement alive, they fell short of a wholehearted commitment to advance immediately with a deal that members also see as a way to contain an increasingly dominant China. “We’re focused on how we can move ahead with 11 countries,” New Zealand Trade Minister Todd McClay said.
One of the biggest challenges is keeping on board Vietnam and Malaysia, which signed up for the deal and promised to make major reforms largely to get better US market access.
“We will need to ensure that our interests remain protected and the benefits derived from it still outweigh the costs,” Malaysian Trade Minister Mustapa Mohamed said. The volume of trade between the remaining countries is barely a quarter of the level it would have been if the United States had remained in the TPP. Officials from TPP countries will meet again in Japan in July and bring proposals in November, McClay said.
Protectionism
Fears of protectionism have grown under the Trump presidency and the failure of the Asia-Pacific countries to agree on their usual joint statement did nothing to quell them. The United States was against wording agreed to by the other 20 APEC countries that supported free trade and opposed protectionism, officials at the talks said.
A statement from the Vietnamese chairman of the talks gave a “commitment to promote trade and investment liberalization.” But the only announcement from all the members was an “Actions Statement” that contained no such commitments. It mentioned topics such as sustainable growth, small businesses and technical cooperation.
The wrangling is similar to what has been seen at gatherings of Group of 20 and Group of Seven financial leaders, where statements were toned down to fit with the new US agenda.
Explaining US opposition to using the word protectionism, Lighthizer said the term was being confused with the steps that were really needed to promote free trade. “Our view is that we want free trade, we want fair trade, we want a system that leads to greater market efficiency throughout the world,” he said.
On the sidelines of the APEC meeting, Lighthizer held a series of one-on-one meetings with key partners. Those included China as well as Canada and Mexico, members of the North American Free Trade Agreement which Trump seeks to renegotiate. China, putting itself forward as a global free trade champion in light of the US shift, is pushing an agreement to encompass the vast majority of Asian economies. The Asia trade deal it favors is called the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership. — Agencies