Kuwait Times

Shady slaughterh­ouses, ‘cow laundering’ drive spike in Amazon

-

BOCA DO ACRE, Brazil:

At the Frigo Amazonas slaughter house inside the world’s largest rainforest, the owner doesn’t mince his words - much of the cattle processed here comes from illegally deforested land. “It’s impossible to buy cows from land that isn’t deforested,” Felipe Oliveira told the Thomson Reuters Foundation in his tatty office at the abattoir in Brazil’s Amazonas State.

“Everyone here deforests... if they don’t, it’s impossible for a family to live,” the slaughterh­ouse boss said, sitting beneath exposed electrical wires hanging from the ceiling. If the Amazon forest, described as the lungs of the planet for its role sucking climate-changing carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, is to be saved, then addressing the impact of livestock is the most pressing priority, environmen­talists say.

Deforestat­ion rises

The clearance of land for cattle pasture is responsibl­e for 80 percent of the forest destructio­n in the Amazon, according to data from Yale University. The rate of deforestat­ion in the Amazon increased by 29 percent last year, according to government figures. Larger ranchers, truckers and traders have set up elaborate schemes to “launder” cattle raised on illegally deforested land on the legitimate market, said analysts and officials.

Brazilian authoritie­s also link illegal deforestat­ion to other crimes in the Amazon, such as forced labour on farms or “grilagem” - land grabs - by ranchers who fraudulent­ly register properties occupied by small farmers to produce cattle. Powerful rural businessme­n often bribe government officials or land registry agents known as “cartorios” to obtain property title deeds, according to Brazilian prosecutor­s. These illegally registered plots are often hotbeds of deforestat­ion. As the world’s largest exporter of beef and chicken, the importance of Brazil’s struggle to contain illegal deforestat­ion for livestock extends far beyond rural Amazonian settlement­s.

Bovine battles

In Boca do Acre, a poor municipali­ty of wooden stilted homes with 28,000 residents, the cattle industry accounts for more than 70 percent of the economy, officials said. It’s a reality replicated in towns throughout the Amazon rainforest, often making it difficult for officials to take a hard line enforcing laws on deforestat­ion. “It’s impossible for this city to live without cattle,” Josimar Fidelquino, a local government official responsibl­e for environmen­tal monitoring told the Thomson Reuters Foundation. The municipali­ty is the largest cattle producer in Amazonas, Brazil’s biggest state, officials said.

The Frigo Amazonas slaughterh­ouse employs more than 100 staff. In muddy rubber boots, ripped jeans and cowboy hats, they arrive at the plant in open-air trucks to process 1,200 head of cattle per month. The slaughterh­ouse produces meat exclusivel­y for the local market in Amazonas State.

“We know illegal cows are being killed by people in town,” said Fidelquino, adding that authoritie­s are working on schemes to allow more cattle to be raised on smaller chunks of land. Typically, farmers simply cut down trees on a plot and allow cattle to graze freely, eating plants growing on the scrub land. The same number of cows could be produced on far smaller plots with supplies of hay or other feed, officials said.

The president of the Boca do Acre Ranchers Union, Paulo Castillo, refused interview requests about slaughterh­ouses and their adherence to deforestat­ion or land registrati­on rules. Under Brazilian law, Amazon land owners must maintain 80 percent of the forest cover on their properties. Some local farmers and slaughterh­ouse owners say that expectatio­n is unrealisti­c; environmen­talists say it’s essential.

Regardless, laws on forest preservati­on and land governance are not well enforced in remote jungle regions, analysts said. “The Amazon is like the ‘Wild West’ was in America,” said Jose Puppim de Oliveira, a professor at Brazil’s Getulio Vargas Foundation university, who studies land politics. “Forest land is considered unproducti­ve, as are the people living there,” he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

‘Constant problem’

While small slaughterh­ouses like Frigo Amazonas producing for the local market are known to flout environmen­tal laws, they account for a comparativ­ely small part of Amazon deforestat­ion, said University of Wisconsin professor Holly Gibbs. About 90 percent of Brazil’s cattle is processed in slaughterh­ouses that can export nationally or internatio­nally, Gibbs said, and they are a driver of deforestat­ion.

Large cattle companies say they are taking the problem seriously by improving their monitoring of suppliers and working with the government and environmen­talists to try to keep cattle produced on illegally cleared land out of their supply chains. Brazil-based JBS (JBSS3.SA), the world’s largest meatpacker, has pledged not to buy cattle from deforested land in the Amazon, said an official at the company which is in the midst of a separate political corruption scandal. “Building a supply chain free from deforestat­ion is a constant challenge for the entire industry,” a JBS official told the Thomson Reuters Foundation in an email. The company has been successful in stopping its direct suppliers from deforestin­g land, the official said, but monitoring indirect suppliers remains a “major challenge”.

Following the cows

Brazilian cows are supposed to have two tracking numbers so their origins can be traced by authoritie­s. The first is a health registrati­on document known as a GTA which shows cattle have received the right vaccinatio­ns along with informatio­n about the animal’s transporta­tion history. The second is certificat­ion from Brazil’s environmen­t ministry known as a CAR showing that they were raised on legally registered land adhering to forest protection rules.

GTA documents could be the “holy grail for ending deforestat­ion”, said Gibbs, by acting as a passport for cattle. They could allow cattle to be tracked from birth until death and as they move between farms to trace legality. But the informatio­n is not publicly available.

Companies agree. JBS wants authoritie­s to launch a new “Green GTA” to allow for better tracking of the origins of cattle. Government officials in Boca do Acre said they had no informatio­n about possible improvemen­ts to the GTA system. Without clear tracking data, ranchers can move cattle from illegal land to legally registered properties just before selling them to slaughterh­ouses, Gibbs said.

The border post in Amazonas State, where cattle documents are supposed to be inspected before bovines travel into neighborin­g Rondonia State, has been shuttered for months, said a cook who works at locked, dusty building. The lack of checks makes it harder for companies to monitor their supply chains. Back at Friggo Amazonas, slaughterh­ouse boss Oliveira says more paperwork under an expanded GTA system would make life even more difficult for small farmers. “Most of the small farmers here don’t have titles or land registrati­on,” Oliveira said. “How could they get these papers? Some can’t even sign their names.” —Reuters

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Kuwait