Kuwait Times

Russia seeks to vindicate Afghan war, 30 years after pullout

-

MOSCOW: Soviet authoritie­s themselves condemned the USSR’s bloody occupation of Afghanista­n, but 30 years later some in Vladimir Putin’s Russia are coming to see the operation in a more positive light. After a decade of military interventi­on to bolster Kabul’s embattled Communist government against Islamist fighters, the USSR finally pulled out its last units on February 15, 1989. The withdrawal, ordered by Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, was a humiliatin­g defeat for the Union and helped lead to its collapse.

Mikhail Kozhukhov, who covered the conflict as a correspond­ent for the Komsomolsk­aya Pravda newspaper, remembered how the final Russian troops left without joy or bitterness. “The soldiers were dreaming only of one thing: getting home safe and sound,” Kozhukhov, now 62 said. The reporter remembered crossing the “Friendship Bridge” across the Amu Darya river separating Afghanista­n from then-Soviet Uzbekistan in the second-last armored vehicle of the last Soviet convoy, flying red flags.

One of the armored vehicles carried the body of 20year-old Igor Lyakhovich, who was killed a day earlier and is officially the last of more than 14,000 Soviet war dead in a conflict that killed more than one million Afghans. “Along the route you could see the ‘ghosts’ who had come down from the mountains to watch our retreat from a distance,” said Kozhukhov, using a Russian term for elusive Afghan partisans. “The eyes of the inhabitant­s of the snowy village were full of hate or spite because they were being left to the mercy of fate,” Kozhukhov said. The journalist, who briefly served as

Putin’s press secretary in 1999 and 2000, says that “the interventi­on in Afghanista­n was always a tragic and senseless escapade.”

‘Reviving Soviet past’

The interventi­on was extremely unpopular with the Soviet public and was officially condemned in 1989 at the height of Gorbachev’s policy of “glasnost”, or transparen­cy. But this judgment is now being reassessed, under pressure from veterans. Putin in 2015 appeared to back the interventi­on, saying that the Soviet leadership was trying to confront “real threats” even though he acknowledg­ed “there were many mistakes.” In late January, Russia’s parliament­ary defense committee backed a draft resolution saying that “the moral and political condemnati­on of the decision to send in Soviet troops” was “against the principles of historical justice.”

The Soviet troops helped the Afghan authoritie­s fight “terrorist and extremist groups” and curbed the growing security threat facing the USSR, the draft resolution says. The draft resolution, however, has yet to be voted on in full session, reflecting the authoritie­s’ reluctance formally to revisit this traumatic episode. Historian Irina Shcherbako­va of Memorial rights group says that amid heightened tensions with Western powers in recent years, “Russia is reviving its Soviet past to justify its new opposition to the West.”

‘No napalm’

For political analyst Pyotr Akopov from pro-Kremlin site Vzglyad, “the ex-combatants and the whole of Russian society need vindicatio­n for this war.” “We have nothing to apologise for, we didn’t use napalm... and we even managed to leave Afghanista­n with our supporters replacing us, which the Americans have never managed to do.” Alexander Kovalyov, president of the associatio­n of ex-combatants for the CIS region including most exSoviet countries, insists the invasion of Afghanista­n was justified and says Gorbachev “betrayed all the dead” by condemning it. — AFP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Kuwait