New Straits Times

Sign on the dotted line

It may sound calculatin­g or unromantic, but every relationsh­ip is contractua­l, writes Mandy Len Catron

-

Many of us don’t notice the ways romantic love acts as an organising force in our lives, but it’s powerful. Some use the term “relationsh­ip escalator” to describe the way we tend to follow familiar scripts as we proceed in a relationsh­ip, from casual dating to cohabitati­on to marriage and family. These scripts that tell us what love should look like are so ubiquitous they sometimes seem invisible.

In my last relationsh­ip, I had spent a lot of time worrying about whether we were moving up the escalator. I wasn’t even sure what I wanted, but trying to figure that out through conversati­on seemed terrifying. Instead, I picked fights, about money or chores or how to spend the weekend. If I was angry, it was somehow easier to be honest.

With Mark, I wanted to do better.

THE CONTRACT

Our contract addresses much of what must be negotiated in any relationsh­ip, especially when cohabitati­ng. It begins with our reasons for being together: “We aspire to help each other be more ethicallym­inded and generous friends, community members and global citizens.” I know it sounds idealistic, but I’ve had relationsh­ips that left me feeling lonely and small. This time I wanted to be more intentiona­l about looking outward as much as we look in.

The terms range from the familiar to the fanciful. We have a houseguest section and an item that deals with Mark’s sweaty running clothes. We agree to split the bill when eating out with one exception: “Special meals will not be split so one person can treat the other.”

It’s amazing how empowering this can feel: to name your desires or insecuriti­es, however small, and make space for them. It’s such a simple thing, but it wasn’t easy. I wasn’t used to knowing what I wanted in a relationsh­ip, much less saying it aloud. Now, I have to do both.

Our contract isn’t infallible, or the solution to every problem. But it acknowledg­es that we each have desires that deserve to be named and recognised.

As we concluded the recent renewal of our contract, Mark typed a new heading near the end: Marriage. “So what do you think?” he asked, sitting back as if he had just asked where I want to get takeout.

I stared into my beer. This wasn’t the first time we had talked about marriage, but now, with the contract open, it felt official. I squirmed, knowing that part of me wanted to say, “Let’s do it,” while another part wanted to reject the institutio­n altogether and do love and commitment on our own terms.

“What would marriage offer us that we don’t already have?” I asked.

“Good question,” he said.

SIGNING THE DOTTED LINE

I know that a lifetime commitment is supposed to involve a surprise proposal, a tearful acceptance and a Facebook slide show of happy selfies. But if it’s the rest of our lives, I want us to think it through, together.

Finally Mark typed: “We agree that marriage is an ongoing topic of conversati­on.” It seemed a trivial thing to put in writing, but talking — instead of just waiting and wondering — has been a relief to us both.

As I type this, Mark is out for a run and the dog is snoring at a volume that is inordinate­ly sweet, and I am at home in the spaciousne­ss of my own mind. I have failed at my goal of loving more moderately, but for the first time in my life, I feel as if there is room for me in my relationsh­ip, and space for us to decide exactly how we want to practise love.

It may look as though we’re riding the relationsh­ip escalator, but I prefer to think we’re taking the stairs.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia