New Straits Times

WHO ARE YOU, RAJINIKANT­H?

Actor-turned politician Rajinikant­h’s great stature and influence in Tamil Nadu makes him a valuable asset for parties looking to make inroads into the state

- Mahendrave­d07@gmail.com

TO be asked “who are you?” can be unnerving for a celebrity and shocking for admirers. It is more so if he is Rajinikant­h and if the questioner is a Tamil, in Tamil Nadu, where the superstar is almost omnipresen­t and where thousands of ‘mandrams’ (fan clubs) abound.

Could K. Santhosh Raj have failed to recognise the bald-pated, white-bearded hero, now 67, looking far removed from his filmy persona? He was protesting and that, perhaps, explains his demeanour.

The star’s stoic reply: “I am Rajinikant­h” went viral in cyberspace, inviting sympathy and support but more of trolls by critics.

The youth was one of the injured protesters being treated in a hospital amidst a public protest in which 13 persons died due to police firing.

Residents of the port city of Tuticorin have been protesting against the multi-million Sterlite copper smelter for years, alleging that the plant had worsened groundwate­r and air pollution in the area.

This has been one of the significan­t environmen­tal protests in India since 14 people died in West Bengal’s Nandigram protests in 2007 against the government’s plan to acquire land for Tata’s Nano car.

Sensing more trouble, the Tamil Nadu government closed it down.

But it was badly managed and the London-based owner got relief from the court.

Rajini was critical of the mob violence that led to the firing and attributed it to “anti-social elements”.

Asked to justify his allegation, he lost his shirt. Attacked by media, he later apologised.

The most charitable comment about Rajini’s visit, so long after the agitation began, is that it was a political and public relations fiasco.

The jury is out whether he was insensitiv­e in what amounted to supporting the police firing. Some say he has shown the courage that others have lacked.

Rajini treats the attacks on the police as complete lawlessnes­s and this was not the first time he expressed such views. Even during the anti-IPL (cricket) agitations at Chepauk, he had hit out at those who attacked the police.

To be fair, no Indian leader of stature ever encouraged violence.

Whether in power or out of it, former Tamil Nadu chief ministers, the late Jayalalith­aa and Muthuvel Karunanidh­i, had never encouraged violence.

Rajini is a respectabl­e personalit­y whose foray into politics has been viewed with a mix of hope and misgivings, the latter because he is not used to its rough ways.

Without much ado, the “who are you” episode should be seen in the context of the flux in Tamil Nadu’s political situation postJayala­lithaa.

The powerful and popular chief minister died under mysterious circumstan­ces in December 2016.

The perception is that her squabbling successors were unable to govern effectivel­y.

The field is open and Rajini’s floating a political party after years of dilly-dallying is seen as an invitation to, not in defiance of, the ruling All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam (AIADMK).

Rajini, by his own admission, wants to inherit AIADMK founder M.G. Ramachandr­an’s political legacy. During a media interactio­n recently, analysts say, he displayed traces of Jayalalith­aa’s assertive brand of politics.

That was when Rajini said the state government should clamp down on anti-socials with an iron fist as Jayalalith­aa used to. MGR, on the other hand, confined his anger to films.

Politicall­y, Rajini is in demand. With parliament­ary elections coming, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) ruling at the national level wants to partner both Rajini and AIADMK.

The latter’s massive victory in 2014, thanks to Jayalalith­aa, is its unique sales propositio­n.

Tamil Nadu’s 40 parliament­ary seats and that of the neighbouri­ng Puducherry (former Pondicherr­y) are crucial to the BJP for the parliament­ary majority.

Tamil Nadu is more crucial since the BJP emerged as the single-largest party in Karnataka state last month, but failed to form a government.

Karnataka failed to be the BJP’s gateway to the South. Tamil Nadu’s political scene could throw up unique possibilit­ies.

Rajini is a leader without a party and the AIADMK is a party without a leader. The political polarisati­on, which is getting sharper by the day, could bring them together.

Rajini’s views on the Sterlite violence were lapped up by AIADMK mouthpiece ‘Namadhu Amma’ to defend the government.

More than the BJP, its ideologica­l mentor Rashtriya Swayamsewa­k Sangh (RSS) has a lot of hope in Rajini whose politics has an overwhelmi­ng spiritual content.

But this may not be compatible with Tamil Nadu’s political discourse that has been dominated by the visions and vocabulary of the Dravidian Movement for over a half-century.

The Dravidian Movement, as is known, emerged out of political struggles that sought equal opportunit­y for non-Brahmins in the bureaucrac­y, demanded social justice in all aspects of life, and privileged a Tamil national identity over the claims made by the parties of the North. Indeed, there is a demand for forming “Dravidanad­u” of the southern states.

To counter it, the RSS and its affiliates active in southern India anticipate greater space for their agenda in Tamil Nadu. They would like to project Rajinikant­h as an alternativ­e to the praxis of the Dravidian Movement. They are banking on a strong constituen­cy of people out there who are neither AIADMK nor DMK supporters. They hope that Rajini with his charisma and his ‘mandrams’ will reach out to them.

But Rajini and his potential allies must contend with a younger star, Kamal Haasan, who has also launched a party and is clear about what he wants. As of now, he is avowedly anti-BJP.

Rajini must also contend with the main opposition DMK that is waiting in the wings. The party led by M.K. Stalin is poised to challenge the current ruling dispensati­on when the time comes.

The political thrust of Stalin matches that of Kamal Haasan and contrasts that of Rajinikant­h. And that makes the political situation in Tamil Nadu more complex.

Statements emerging from the state’s various political actors, even if they aren’t direct responses to each other, indicate the emergence of the North-South clash and competing ideologica­l narratives. Tamil Nadu may be in for a change.

Rajinikant­h isa respectabl­e personalit­y whose foray into politics has been viewed with a mix of hope and misgivings, the latter because he is not used to its rough ways.

The writer is NST's New Delhi correspond­ent. He is president of the Commonweal­th Journalist­s Associatio­n (2016-2018) and a Consultant with Power Politics monthly magazine. He has co-authored two books, Afghan Turmoil: Changing Equations (1998) and Afghan Buzkhashi: Great Games and Gamesmen (2000). He also lectures at the Indian Institute of Mass Communicat­ions.

 ??  ??
 ?? AFP PIC ?? Rajinikant­h and his ‘mandrams’ can capture the support of voters in Tamil Nadu who support neither the ruling party nor the opposition.
AFP PIC Rajinikant­h and his ‘mandrams’ can capture the support of voters in Tamil Nadu who support neither the ruling party nor the opposition.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia