New Straits Times

No red card for VAR in World Cup

- RUEBEN DUDLEY Petaling Jaya, Selangor

World Cup in Russia had outstandin­g moments, but its most significan­t impact was the implementa­tion of the video assistant referee (VAR) for making crucial decisions in matches.

VAR, used for the first time ever by Fifa at its flagship competitio­n, proved its worth and necessity, though on occasion left much room to cry foul.

VAR works best with little leeway for subjectivi­ty and interpreta­tion.

Spain’s Iago Aspas’ 90thminute goal against Morocco, ruled out initially before VAR correctly overturned that decision, gave the Spaniards top spot in their group.

There was Brazil’s Neymar’s theatrical fall in the penalty area against Costa Rica. The referee awarded the penalty, but for the first time in the Russia World Cup, a VAR review rightly overturned the official’s decision.

But when France were awarded a penalty in the final against Croatia for what appeared to be an accidental handball by Croatia’s Ivan Perisic, it not only broke hearts but also showed how critical it was for referees to make informed decisions in light of VAR’s use.

In all, there were 29 penalty kicks at the World Cup this year, 16 more than at the previous tournament in Brazil.

Of those, VAR helped officials make a decision 11 times. That is significan­t and shows the impact the innovation has made.

Tennis, cricket, rugby union and American football have used technology for decades.

For all of the downside of VAR — stoppages of play and secondgues­sing in applying the rule — VAR is a welcome addition to football.

It’s a step in the right direction, but still needs to be fine-tuned.

 ?? REUTERS PIC ?? VAR, used for the first time in a World Cup, is a step in the right direction, but needs to be fine-tuned.
REUTERS PIC VAR, used for the first time in a World Cup, is a step in the right direction, but needs to be fine-tuned.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia