New Straits Times

‘ARUL KANDA PROMISED THE MOON BUT GAVE LITTLE’

He is praised and criticised by National Audit Dept director

- SHARANJIT SINGH news@nst.com.my

THE National Audit Department (NAD) had a love-hate relationsh­ip with former 1Malaysia Developmen­t Bhd (1MDB) chief executive Arul Kanda Kandasamy, 43, the High Court heard yesterday.

Much to the amusement of everyone, including the accused himself, Arul Kanda was praised and criticised in the same sentence by a prosecutio­n witness in the 1MDB audit tampering trial.

This happened when former NAD director Saadatul Nafisah Bashir Ahmad, 65, was cross examined by lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, who is representi­ng Datuk Seri Najib Razak in the case.

The senior counsel was having a field day grilling Saadatul Nafisah on how the NAD went about preparing the final 1MDB audit report before it was presented to the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) in 2016, when the topic of Arul Kanda’s involvemen­t cropped up.

Shafee asked the seventh prosecutio­n witness whether she knew when Arul Kanda joined 1MDB and she acknowledg­ed that he was roped in to work with the strategic developmen­t company on Jan 5, 2015.

He then manoeuvred his questions to suggest that Arul Kanda was therefore quite new in 1MDB when the audit report was being prepared and this was the reason the latter could not provide much of the informatio­n requested by auditors.

However, Saadatul Nafisah’s reply caught everyone by surprise when she started singing praises of the former head of investment banking at Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, who was head-hunted to work for 1MDB.

“No, no... Arul Kanda is a very intelligen­t man.

“He learns everything very fast,” she said, while adding that Arul Kanda promised many things but delivered very little.

“We asked for informatio­n but they (1MDB) took months to respond. The PAC kept pressuring us (to have the 1MDB audit ready) and I went to see Arul Kanda a few times.”

Saadatul Nafisah contradict­ed herself when she said Arul Kanda cooperated with the NAD but the informatio­n auditors requested was never supplied to them.

Shafee pounced on her answer and said: “You have just praised and condemned him in one sentence. First you said he is very good, then you said he did nothing.”

She clarified by saying: “He cooperated with us... he promised us...he was the 1MDB chief executive officer then... we waited and waited for the informatio­n that he promised, but it never came.”

Shafee asked her whether she knew that 1MDB was unlike other companies at that time as it was tangled in “conspiraci­es within conspiraci­es”.

Shafee: Do you know this?

Saadatul Nafisah: Not at that time. Shafee: You know of Jho Low (fugitive businessma­n Low Taek Jho) Saadatul Nafisah: Yes. Shafee: You know he played a big role in all this? Saadatul Nafisah: Now I know. But he (Arul Kanda) should have informed us instead of making us wait for months

Earlier, Shafee also asked her if she knew what had caused the acrimoniou­s relationsh­ip between NAD and 1MDB.

She said she was unaware of such a thing and Shafee said it was caused by Arul Kanda’s predecesso­r, Datuk Shahrol Azral Ibrahim Halmi.

“It was he who obstructed attempts to audit 1MDB before Arul Kanda came in.

“He was such a hindrance that it led to the acrimoniou­s relationsh­ip between NAD and 1MDB,” he said.

Shafee got Saadatul Nafisah, who led a special team to audit 1MDB in 2015, to agree that a report that had become the subject of the ongoing trial was not the final copy and could be amended.

She agreed that it was only an interim draft copy and NAD had the liberty of amending it without compromisi­ng its position.

She agreed that former chief secretary to the government Tan Sri Ali Hamsa did not force or directly ask auditors to drop certain things from the final report.

“It was said in a good way... of course he did not directly say such things,” she said of a meeting where Ali allegedly directed the 1MDB audit report to be modified with certain paragraphs to be dropped from the final copy.

Asked why the final 1MDB audited report ended up being classified under the Official Secrets Act before it was tabled to the PAC, Saadatul Nafisah said it was done on the advice of the authoritie­s after the first draft copy was leaked immediatel­y after it was presented to the PAC.

The trial before judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan will continue at a yet-to-be-fixed date.

Najib and his co-accused, Arul Kanda, are on trial for tampering the 1MDB final audit report.

They face up to 20 years jail and fine if convicted.

Earlier, at the onset of yesterday’s hearing, Shafee applied and succeeded in getting the court to order PAC to provide its notes of proceeding­s of former auditor general Tan Sri Ambrin Buang’s testimony at the hearing in 2016.

Ambrin had testified for the prosecutio­n in the audit tampering trial and he may be recalled for further cross examinatio­n.

 ?? PIC BY ASWADI ALIAS ?? Arul Kanda Kandasamy at the Kuala Lumpur Courts Complex yesterday.
PIC BY ASWADI ALIAS Arul Kanda Kandasamy at the Kuala Lumpur Courts Complex yesterday.
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Saadatul Nafisah Bashir Ahmad
Saadatul Nafisah Bashir Ahmad

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia