The Borneo Post (Sabah)

Decision time in P&G boardroom brawl over direction of company

-

NEW YORK: A costly monthslong battle over the direction of one of America’s biggest companies culminates on Tuesday with a shareholde­r vote at Procter & Gamble (P&G) headquarte­rs in Cincinnati.

The fight pits the maker of Gillette razors and Olay soap against activist investor Nelson Peltz, 75, a billionair­e hedge fund chief who has pitched himself as the outsider needed to reignite P&G, the largest company by market capitalisa­tion ever to face a proxy battle.

The grizzled veteran of highprofil­e boardroom brawls accuses the company of operating with excessive cost, being weak on innovation and missing the boat on key shifts in consumer behavior.

Peltz, whose firm Trian Partners holds 1.5 per cent of P&G shares, attributes declining market share in key businesses to P&G’s “slow moving and insular culture.”

His campaign has been fortified by support from respected proxy advisory services, including Glass Lewis, which said a new voice might help reinvigora­te a giant that appears to suffer from a “degree of complacenc­y.”

P&G counters that Peltz’s campaign is based on an outdated perspectiv­e on the company and ignores key hires of outsiders as well as progress since its decision in 2014 to divest dozens of underperfo­rming products in order to target giant brands that resonate best with consumers.

Company executives also say Peltz’s campaign seems to be motivated mostly by short-term gain to the potential detriment of longterm performanc­e.

“We strongly recommend you give us the opportunit­y to finish this transforma­tion,” chief executive David Taylor said on an October 3 investor conference call.

Whoever wins, the battle has been costly.

P&G has estimated that it will spend US$35 million to try to keep Peltz off the board, while Trian has said it expects to spend US$25 million, according to securities filings.

P&G has reported revenue declines for the last three years, pointing to the drag from the strong dollar that has caused it to underperfo­rm against European rivals Unilever and L’Oreal in some key benchmarks. — AFP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia