Deadly US naval collisions in Pacific ‘avoidable’

WASHINGTON: A pair of collisions in the Pacific that left 17 American sailors dead were avoidable and caused by ‘multiple failures’ of those on watch, the Navy said in a report.

The separate incidents have highlighted leadership failures and the stresses of frequent deployments across the Pacific region, but also have shone a spotlight on sailors not paying proper attention in busy shipping lanes.

“Both of these accidents were preventable and the respective investigations found multiple failures by watch standers that contributed to the incidents,” Chief of Naval Operations Admiral John Richardson said in the report. “We must do better,” he added.

On June 17, the USS Fitzgerald – a destroyer – smashed into a Philippine-flagged cargo ship off Japan, leaving seven sailors dead and leading to several officers being disciplined. The collision was “avoidable and resulted from an accumulation of smaller errors over time,” the report states, resulting in “a lack of adherence to sound navigational practices.”

“Specifically, Fitzgerald’s watch teams disregarded established norms of basic contact management and, more importantly, leadership failed to adhere to well-established protocols put in place to prevent collisions.”

The second deadly incident

Both of these accidents were preventable and the respective investigations found multiple failures by watch standers that contributed to the incidents. Admiral John Richardson, Chief of Naval Operations

came Aug 21 when the USS John S McCain collided with the Alnic MC merchant tanker as the destroyer headed to Singapore, tearing a huge hole in the hull, killing 10 sailors and injuring dozens more.

“The collision between John S McCain and Alnic MC was also avoidable and resulted primarily from complacency, overconfidence and lack of procedural compliance,” the report states.

“A major contributing factor to the collision was sub-standard level of knowledge regarding the operation of the ship control console,” the report adds.

Investigators single out the ship’s commanding officer, who “disregarded recommendations from his executive officer, navigator and senior watch officer to set sea and anchor watch teams in a timely fashion to ensure the safe and effective operation of the ship.”

In other words, the report says, no one on the ship’s bridge knew how to correctly operate the ship’s controls.