The Borneo Post (Sabah)

Netflix's 'The Crown' paid its queen less than her prince

-

IF THERE is a lesson to take away from the first two seasons of “The Crown,” it is that no sane person would dare cross Queen Elizabeth II. Netflix seems to have learned this too late, however, as it was revealed on Tuesday that lead actress Claire Foy made less than costar Matt Smith for her work on the show.

Variety reported that producers Suzanne Mackie and Andy Harries were asked during a discussion at the INTV Conference in Jerusalem whether the actors playing Queen Elizabeth and her husband, Prince Philip, were paid the same amount. The pair admitted that Smith made more due to his “Doctor Who” fame, insisting that the inequity would be amended in the future.

“Going forward, no one gets paid more than the queen,” Mackie said.

Unfortunat­ely for Foy, she won’t be the one paid more. The period drama’s unusual structure calls for an entirely different set of actors every two seasons. While Foy and Smith depicted the royal couple from the beginning of Queen Elizabeth’s reign until the mid1960s, their characters have been recast for the third and fourth seasons. Olivia Colman will play the queen when the series resumes filming in July, while the new Philip has yet to be announced. Helena Bonham Carter will replace Vanessa Kirby as Princess Margaret, the queen’s rebellious younger sister.

“Seasons 3 and 4 will be the test of whether the show really has the legs to survive,” Harries said, per Variety. “I think we were the first television series ever to change cast and continue, and we will change cast twice. It’s daunting but exciting and I hope it’ll keep the series fresh and really of interest to people.”

In addition to the obvious egregiousn­ess of a series lead making less than a supporting actor, the revelation is particular­ly surprising when considerin­g critical reception. Foy received high praise for her portrayal of the restrained monarch, in which she nailed everything from the queen’s posh accent to her physical poise. She was nominated for an Emmy and won a Golden Globe for her performanc­e in the first season, arguably placing her at the same level of fame as (if not higher than) Smith. Yet she still got a smaller paycheque than him for the second season, which earned her another Golden Globe nod.

This isn’t the first time a woman has been paid less than a lower-billed actor. After Kevin Spacey was accused of sexual misconduct, “All the Money in the World” director Ridley Scott replaced him with Christophe­r Plummer and called the rest of the cast back to reshoot pivotal scenes. Michelle Williams, billed as the film’s lead actress, earned a fraction of what co-star Mark Wahlberg did for reshoots. USA Today reported that Williams earned just US$80 a day, adding up to less than US$1,000, while Wahlberg was paid US$1.5 million total. Both actors were represente­d by the same agency.

Going forward, no one gets paid more than the queen. Suzanne Mackie, producer

 ??  ??
 ?? — Courtesy of Netflix ?? Netflix paid Foy less than co-star Smith for her work on ‘The Crown’. She played Queen Elizabeth II, the lead role, while he played her husband, Philip Mountbatte­n, Duke of Edinburgh.
— Courtesy of Netflix Netflix paid Foy less than co-star Smith for her work on ‘The Crown’. She played Queen Elizabeth II, the lead role, while he played her husband, Philip Mountbatte­n, Duke of Edinburgh.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia