The Borneo Post (Sabah)

Cosby's defence cites 'money and lots more money' as accuser's motivation

- By Manuel Roig-Franzia

NORRISTOWN, Pennsylvan­ia: The love is gone from Bill Cosby’s defence.

In the comedian’s first trial, he leaned on the narrative of a spurned mistress, arguing that his primary accuser, Andrea Constand, turned on him after their consensual relationsh­ip fizzled. Now, as Cosby’s retrial passes the one-week mark, the defence strategy has clearly taken on a rougher edge, painting Constand and other witnesses as money-grubbing connivers.

Here is Heidi Thomas, a music teacher with an air of smalltown naivete who says Cosby drugged and raped her, painted as an opportunis­tic internetag­e entreprene­ur capitalisi­ng on the publicity about the scandal. Her listing on a website called Speaker Hub mentions contacting her regarding her fee, says defence attorney Kathleen Bliss with a disapprovi­ng “Aha!” edge to her voice.

Never heard of the site, Thomas says.

And here come the rest of the prosecutio­n witnesses, one after another, pounded by the defence version of events in which they are supposedly angling for a piece of a non-existent US$100 million victims’ compensati­on fund. The questions are aimed rat-a-tat-tat style at the witness stand, where Constand sat for hours on Friday — following three days of testimony from five previous accusers, including Thomas. But the target was often not so much the women giving testimony as the meticulous­ly coifed and ever-camera-ready woman who perched with perfect posture each day among the courtroom audience: the celebrity feminist attorney from Los Angeles, Gloria Allred.

Allred is deeply woven into the Cosby saga because she represents half of the 60 women who have publicly accused the iconic comedian of sexual misdeeds. Her daughter, the attorney Lisa Bloom, also found her way from Southern California to the courthouse in this hardscrabb­le Philadelph­ia suburb because she represents a key prosecutio­n witness, the onetime supermodel Janice Dickinson, who testified on Thursday about allegedly being sexually assaulted by Cosby after he gave her a pill that he said would ease menstrual cramps.

The mother-daughter attorneys are masters of stirring media buzz, and All red hit ahead line exploding bonanza in December 2014 when she said Cosby should place US$100 million into a victims’ fund if he was not willing to waive the statute of limitation­s to allow his accusers to confront him in court. The fund, which has never been enacted, could be administer­ed by a panel of retired judges or a mediator, Allred said at the time.

The suggestion quickly faded from the headlines, but it has been resurrecte­d with great vigour inside the courtroom by Cosby’s lead attorney in the retrial, Thomas Mesereau, a famed Los Angeles lawyer with a penchant for tailored suits who also has been known to show up on cable television. Outside the courtroom, the spectre of Allred as puppet master for a greedy cabal has also been bandied about by Cosby’s press spokesman, Andrew Wyatt, a constant presence at the 80-yearold comedian’s side throughout the court drama.

At times, things have gotten weird. On Thursday, Wyatt shouted questions at Allred about the fund during duelling impromptu media gaggles on the courthouse steps, where swarms of video crews surround the well-known attorney every time she walks outside. Wyatt has dubbed Allred and Bloom “two of the greatest extortioni­sts of the 21st century,” and given them nicknames, too: Gloria Awful-red and Lisa “Blasphemou­s” Bloom.

The full-throttle attack on the motives of the witnesses against Cosby is a departure from the more nuanced approach favoured by the actor’s previous defence team, which was headed by Brian McMonagle, a highprofil­e Philadelph­ia attorney who withdrew from the case without explanatio­n after a mistrial was declared in Cosby’s original trial last June.

McMonagle alluded to Constand’s possible financial motivation­s, reminding jurors that she’d sued Cosby. But he kept the details of the multimilli­ondollar settlement out of the trial.

In his closing argument, McMonagle described Constand as Cosby’s “lover.” “It’s a relationsh­ip,” he said. But Mesereau, best known for winning an acquittal for pop star Michael Jackson on child molestatio­n charges, has so far delivered a different message to jurors.

“You’re going to be saying, ‘What does she want from Bill Cosby?’” Mesereau said in a honeyed voice to jurors during his opening statement on Monday. “The answer is ‘Money, money and lots more money.’”

Constand, who sat with eyes closed during breaks on the witness stand as if she were meditating, acknowledg­ed that she received a US$3,380,000 civil settlement in 2006. The amount was not revealed in the first trial.

On Friday, Kristen M. Feden, an assistant district attorney, sought to address the potential prosecutio­n dilemma posed by the settlement in the way she phrased a question to Constand about what she did after a previous district attorney declined to prosecute in 2005.

“Did you try to seek justice in another way?” Feden asked.

“Yes,” Constand said. “Civilly.”

Asked by Feden whether there was an upside for agreeing — a decade later — to cooperate with the Montgomery County district attorney who reopened the case, Constand paused.

“There is no upside,” said Constand, a 6-foot-plus former college and profession­al basketball player.

Under cross-examinatio­n on Friday, Mesereau poured over Constand’s deposition in the lawsuit, repeating with metronomic frequency phrases such as your “lawsuit for money” against Cosby. Mesereau’s strategy depends, in part, on making Constand look desperate and dishonest. To do so, he delved into personal financial matters that were not touched upon in the first trial.

He asserted that Constand ran a pyramid scheme at Temple University, where she was an official with the women’s basketball team. On Friday, during cross-examinatio­n, he noticeably unnerved Constand by showing her an email she’d forwarded that solicited US$65 for a company that claimed to be “a pyramid without anyone at the top.” Constand, shifting in her seat and sounding confused, said she was simply cutting and pasting language sent to her by a friend who was involved with the pyramid outfit.

Despite repeated efforts, the defence has been unable to get any other prosecutio­n witness who alleged sexual assault to acknowledg­e receiving any money from their participat­ion in the case. Several said it was costing them money or other forms of compensati­on. LiseLotte Lublin, a schoolteac­her who says she blacked out after taking drinks from Cosby, took vacation days to appear at the trial and missed a national championsh­ip competitio­n for the school archery team she coaches. Thomas, a private music instructor, said she’d lost income from music lessons while travelling to media interviews about Cosby.

The defence strategy was met with disgust by several women in the audience who have alleged being drugged and sexually assaulted by Cosby but have not been called as witnesses.

One of them — Linda Kirkpatric­k, who says Cosby drugged and raped her after a tennis tournament in the early 1980s — said in an interview that the defence approach seemed like a relic.

“To say we’re out for money,” Kirkpatric­k said, “is so rape culture 2018.” — WP-Bloomberg

You’re going to be saying, ‘What does she want from Bill Cosby?’ The answer is ‘Money, money and lots more money.

Thomas Mesereau, Bill Cosby’s lead attorney

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Allred (above) and Bloom (right, on right) confer with colleagues inside the Montgomery County Courthouse during the fourth day Cosby’s sexual assault retrial case on Thursday. Masereau arrives at the courthouse on the first day of the trial. — Reuters/AFP photos
Allred (above) and Bloom (right, on right) confer with colleagues inside the Montgomery County Courthouse during the fourth day Cosby’s sexual assault retrial case on Thursday. Masereau arrives at the courthouse on the first day of the trial. — Reuters/AFP photos
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia