Australian academic stalked in Hong Kong hits out at China, vows will not be bullied

SYDNEY: An Australian academic who was followed for a week by a state-owned newspaper in Hong Kong has suggested Beijing could be behind the intimidation and has vowed not to be bullied.

Kevin Carrico — a lecturer in Chinese Studies at Sydney’s Macquarie University — was tailed by the Wen Wei Po tabloid during a visit earlier this month and was the subject of a front-page ‘expose’.

The paper accused him of stirring ‘pro-independence’ sentiment in Hong Kong, holding ‘secret meetings’, and secretly photographed him throughout his week-long trip, as well as on previous visits.

The incident has raised concerns about ebbing freedoms in Hong Kong, including the ability of academics to carry out research.

Carrico — who has written extensively on Chinese nationalism — on Wednesday accused the paper of trying to intimidate him or people he speaks to, telling AFP its motivations were not ‘particularly pure or admirable’.

If the authorities were trying to scare him away from returning to Hong Kong, that was ‘not going to happen’, Carrico insisted.

But he fears it was ‘Beijing signalling to Hong Kong to refuse me entry next time’ or‘ intimidating people away from speaking with me’. That, he admitted, ‘could happen, considering how tense things are in Hong Kong now’. Beijing has sought to tighten its grip on the city following mass pro-democracy protests in 2014. Since then, key protest leaders have been charged while a string of pro-democracy lawmakers were stopped from sitting in the Hong Kong legislature.

Carrico said he fears the paper has now made him a possible target for ‘patriotic hoodlums’ of gangs with links to the Chinese Communist Party when he does return.

“The Wen Wei Po is essentially an intelligence service masquerading as a paper and should be shut down,” he said.

In a statement issued yesterday, Wen Wei Po defended its article, saying it was built around ‘clear facts’ that ‘complied with usual news reporting rules and skills’.

The paper accused Carrico of making ‘false accusations’ and attacking press freedom, adding it reserved the right to pursue legal action against the academic.