Both presidential candidates declare victory in Madagascar
ANTANANARIVO: Both candidates in Madagascar’s presidential election have claimed victory in the fierce battle for power in the Indian Ocean island.
Andry Rajoelina and Marc Ravalomanana – who have each held the top job in the impoverished country before – declared themselves winners in the run-off which analysts warned was likely to draw claims of fraud.
“Change is coming tomorrow, and today you can say that ‘Papa’ is elected,” Ravalomanana told supporters on Wednesday night at his headquarters, using his nickname.
“Whatever happens, only one thing counts, we will win.”
However, his rival Rajoelina said: “I am sure I’m going to win but we’ll wait for the official results.”
Change is coming tomorrow, and today you can say that ‘Papa’ is elected. Marc Ravalomanana
The contenders, who came a close first and second in November’s first-round election, were both banned from running in the 2013 ballot as part of an agreement to end recurring crises that have rocked Madagascar since independence from France in 1960.
In the first round, Rajoelina won 39 per cent compared with 35 per cent for Ravalomanana.
Both camps alleged they were victims of fraud and cheating.
The polls closed on Wednesday evening.
The election count could be tense with the first significant results due only by next week.
The EU observer mission, which said turnout was around 50 per cent, called for candidates and their supporters to wait patiently for the official results.
“It is not by mobilising in the street that they will win, so I ask them resolutely that they refrain from any gesture that could taint the smooth running of the election,” mission chief Cristian Preda said Wednesday.
Ravalomanana, 69, was first elected president in 2002 but was forced to resign seven years later by violent demonstrations supported by Rajoelina, the then mayor of the capital Antananarivo.
Rajoelina, 44, was installed by the army and ruled until 2014. The two contenders crisscrossed the country via helicopter to secure votes.
Both candidates have spent lavishly, with promises and handouts distributed liberally to voters, who are among the poorest in Africa.
With the personalities of the two men dominating the election, issues such as poverty, corruption and lack of basic services and infrastructure have been largely pushed to the side.
Some analysts warn a fractious election fallout could damage the chances of future development.
“The results could be very tight and, in this context, even small irregularities could lead one or the other candidate to contest them,” said Marcus Schneider, an analyst at the Bonn-based Friedrich Ebert Foundation.