Does marketing of products affect children’s career choices?

LONDON: Most British parents think “pink for girls, blue for boys” marketing reinforces messages about what girls and boys can do, according to a survey released on Tuesday ahead of a major inquiry into the impact of early stereotyping.

Education experts said toy marketing helped bolster messages about what was “appropriate” for each gender, which fed into later choices about which subjects to study and which careers to consider.

The Fawcett Society, a campaign group that is launching a year-long commission to examine the issue, said it would challenge retailers and manufacturers “to drop the lazy stereotypes and use their power responsibly”.

Six in 10 parents agreed the way products were marketed for children reinforced stereotypes, according to the Fawcett study.

“The messages we give to children, at home, at school and as a society, has a huge bearing on the choices they feel are open to them, the skills and interests they develop, and on their futures,” said commission cochairwoman Becky Francis.

“We need to open up those choices for our children rather than narrowing them down,” added Francis, director of University College London’s Institute of Education.

Most of those polled in the online survey of 1,018 people believed the issue also affected boys, with six in 10 agreeing it was more acceptable for a girl to be a “tomboy” than a boy to be “feminine”.

Nearly 70 per cent of younger men said stereotypes had a damaging effect on perceptions of what it meant to be a man or a woman.

The findings come at a time of heightened debate over “toxic masculinity” in the light of the #MeToo movement on sexual harassment. Commission cochairman David Lammy, a lawmaker with the opposition Labour party who heads an all-party parliamentary group on fatherhood, said unjust stereotypes were “massively detrimental” to society. — Reuters