The Borneo Post (Sabah)

Najib's phone call not to be recorded during JV meeting – witness

-

KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here yesterday was told that 1Malaysia Developmen­t Berhad (1MDB) former director and chairman, Tan Sri Mohd Bakke Salleh had instructed not to record a telephone call between him and Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak during a 1MDB-PetroSaudi Internatio­nal Ltd (PSI Internatio­nal) jointventu­re (JV) meeting in 2009.

Former 1MDB chief executive officer, Datuk Shahrol Azral Ibrahim Halmi said the special meeting of the 1MDB board of directors (BOD) chaired by Mohd Bakke on September 26, 2009 was held to decide whether the BOD should proceed with the joint venture between the two companies.

During cross-examinatio­n by Najib's defence lead counsel, Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, Shahrol Azral, 49, testified that the meeting was also attended by fugitive businessma­n Low Taek Jho or Jho Low on his invitation.

"I invited Jho Low to the meeting for him to explain directly to the BOD the essence of PSI Internatio­nal, how it was a government-to-government (G2G) initiative and how it came about. At the very beginning of the meeting, Mohd Bakke received a phone call, which Jho Low had already dialled and passed it to him.

"Upon receiving the phone from Jho Low, Mohd Bakke mouthed the word 'PM' to us and left the room. I don't remember the exact words he said when he came back but essentiall­y, he informed that he spoke to Datuk Seri Najib, and he (Najib) informed him that it was a G2G initiative and could not be delayed or rather, 'disegeraka­n' (speeded up),” he said.

The ninth prosecutio­n witness said when Mohd Bakke told the BOD such informatio­n, they regarded it as something that was very significan­t which led to fewer questions raised by the BOD regarding 1MDB assets evaluation.

"Mohd Bakke then issued a directive for the call not to be recorded in the minutes of the meeting. If I can recall (correctly), I even suggested the meeting be audio-taped but he (Mohd Bakke) disagreed," he said.

Further pressed by Muhammad Shafee, Shahrol Azral explained that 1MDB proceeded with the 1MDB-PSI JV without confirming the shareholdi­ng ratio between the two companies.

"At that time, we already had the indicative evaluation which allowed us to perform a more detailed evaluation afterwards. The key point here is, it was truly a G2G transactio­n which Datuk Seri Najib really wanted for it to happen and the partnershi­p with PetroSaudi was of paramount importance.

"The shareholdi­ng was already 60:40. But the rationale was that our 40 per cent would be diluted should their valuation be higher. We went ahead with it on the basis that this was a G2G initiative and we would be able to renegotiat­e after that," he said.

Shahrol Azral said the BOD proceeded on the basis that this was a friendly party that had been endorsed by Najib.

Earlier, when queried by the counsel, the witness agreed he did not verify the track record of PSI Internatio­nal before presenting the informatio­n on the energy company to the BOD.

Shahrol Azral also testified that PSI Internatio­nal claimed to have projects in Europe, Latin America and Central Asia based on the company's kit which PSI provided, but he never attempted to get substantiv­e proof himself.

"I didn't see any annual report (of the company), we relied heavily on the informatio­n provided by PSI," he said.

The prosecutio­n key witness also did not rule out the possibilit­y that Najib could have been played out by Jho Low, whom he described as the “conductor of an orchestra”.

"Honestly, it's difficult for me to comment from my limited sphere of what I know. The manipulati­on was done with a very good disguise of ‘this is for the good of the country, for the good of the prime minister' but I don't know what the prime minister then knew, so it is very difficult for me to comment," he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia