The unexpected year of Meghan Markle, the most-Googled actress of 2016
TWO MONTHS ago, Meghan Markle was best known as one of the stars of “Suits,” the legal drama that’s not “Psych” or “Burn Notice” or any of the other vaguely-titled USA network shows that sound exactly the same.
That all changed as soon as the tabloids broke the story in late October: Markle, 35, was dating Prince Harry, 32, the impish redhead who also happens to be fifth in line to the British throne. This news caused an Internet meltdown as people around the world raced to their keyboards to type: “Who is Meghan Markle?” That’s not an exaggeration — Google recently confirmed that Markle was the most-searched actress of 2016. Brad Pitt was the most-searched actor.
Markle, a lifestyle blogger and humanitarian activist who plays paralegal Rachel Zane on “Suits,” is suddenly on her way to becoming a household name, with the USA series showing up in headlines across the world. ( It’s rather perfect timing for the show, which returns for a seventh season in January.) How did it happen? And why did Markle cause such a frenzy?
The timeline is blurry as to when exactly Markle and Prince Harry met; the common assumption is that they met in May while Harry was in Toronto( where“Suits” films) on behalf of the Invictus Games, an Olympics- style competition for wounded veterans. But Us Weekly reported in its recent cover story that the couple met in June through mutual friend Markus Anderson, a consultant to the exclusive Soho House.
Regardless, they hit it off, with the Daily Mail reporting that Harry was immediately smitten, and he “bombarded” Markle with texts. Soon, they were officially a couple. They visited each other over the summer and miraculously managed to keep things on the down low until Halloween weekend, when a British tabloid report trumpeted that “the red-haired royal Romeo, often dubbed the world’s most eligible bachelor” had found love with an American actress. “He’s happier than he’s been for many years,” a “source” gushed. The reaction was swift, and not kind. Among the things that Internet commenters apparently found controversial: The fact that Markle is biracial, with an African-American mother and Caucasian father. The fact that she’s divorced; she split with her first husband, producer Trevor Engelson, in 2013. (“The prejudice against royal love interests who have previously been hitched goes back a long time,” the Telegraph explained.) Not to mention the fact that she’s American, born and raised in Los Angeles. The Sun quoted Markle’s half- sister as calling the actress a “shallow social climber” and saying “Her behaviour is certainly not befitting of a Royal Family member.” The Daily Mail dubbed her “(very) socially ambitious.”
Detailed statement
“She’s clearly a woman who is determined to make it socially, financially and eve non a global stage,” Alison Boshoff wrote in the Daily Mail. “The question is, where on earth will Prince Harry — who has always come across as a man of simple tastes — fit into her world?” The public criticism was so severe that a week later, the palace — which rarely comments on personal matters — took the incredibly rare step of issuing a long, harsh, detailed statement, condemning the attacks on Markle and her family: The past week has seen a line crossed. ( Harry’s) girlfriend, Meghan Markle, has been subject to a wave of abuse and harassment. Some of this has been very public — the smear on the front page of a national newspaper; the racial undertones of comment pieces; and the outright sexism and racism of social media trolls and web article comments. Some of it has been hidden from the public — the nightly legal battles to keep defamatory stories out of papers; her mother having to struggle past photographers in order to get to her front door; the attempts of reporters and photographers to gain illegal entry to her home and the calls to police that followed; the substantial bribes offered by papers to her ex-boyfriend; the bombardment of nearly every friend, co-worker, and loved one in her life.
Prince Harry is worried about Ms Markle’s safety and is deeply disappointed that he has not been able to protect her. It is not right that a few months into a relationship with him that Ms Markle should be subjected to such a storm. He knows commentators will say this is “the price she has to pay” and that “this is all part of the game.” He strongly disagrees. This is not a game — it is her life and his.
The statement also signalled that the relationship was very serious, which only ramped up the attention. In the weeks that followed, Markle is still photographed on the most mundane occasions: Climbing in a taxi, going to yoga class with her mom. The Daily Mail did a deep dive into her ancestry. Many publications are exploring her lifestyle web site, TheTig.com, where she also chronicles her humanitarian work, as the UN Women Advocate and a global ambassador for World Vision.
The latest rumours now focus on whether she’ll fit in with the royal family. Some gossip sites say defi nitely not; Us Weekly reports that Harry’s grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II, is “fully supportive” and “delighted to see Harry in a loving relationship,” according to a palace source, who predicts a spring engagement.
Markle hasn’t commented directly about the increased attention. She recently wrote an essay for Elle UK about being biracial. She talked about her character on “Suits,” and how Rachel was initially described as a “dream girl,” though the producers didn’t have a specific vision for what the character looked like.
“In making a choice like that, the ‘Suits producers’ helped shift the way pop culture defi nes beauty. The choices made in these rooms trickle into how viewers see the world, whether they’re aware of it or not,” Markle wrote. “Some households may never have had a black person in their house as a guest, or someone biracial. Well, now there are a lot of us on your TV and in your home with you.” — WP-Bloomberg