The Borneo Post

‘My Cousin Rachel’ is pretty to look at, but a little dull

- By Ann Hornaday

“MY COUSIN Rachel” swirls around a deliciousl­y twisty premise: On a sprawling Cornwall estate in the 19th century, a young heir-to-be, Philip Ashley, discovers that his beloved guardian, Ambrose, has died mysterious­ly while taking the healing sun in Italy.

Philip immediatel­y suspects foul play at the hand of the woman Ambrose married during his sojourn, a distant cousin named Rachel, and determines to take revenge — a plot slightly complicate­d by the fact that, when she unexpected­ly fetches up in England, he falls hopelessly in love with her.

The setup is so irresistib­le that it’s been done before: Back in the 1950s, Richard Burton and Olivia de Havilland played Philip and Rachel in a production that is memorable mostly for its windswept atmosphere and Burton’s US debut. In this iteration of “My Cousin Rachel,” Sam Claflin and Rachel Weisz do their best to ignite sparks that are alternatel­y hostile, seductive, calculatin­g and deceptive.

They succeed only fitfully, with Clafl in’s winky-blinky jitters no match for Weisz’s far more layered slow burn. There are more than a few moments of genuine mystery and erotic charge between them, but they seem to dissipate in a production that seems to loosen and flutter just when it should be tightening the screws.

Written and directed by Roger Michell (“Notting Hill,” “Le Week- end”), “My Cousin Rachel” is being marketed with an emphasis on its provenance: It’s based on a novel by Daphne du Maurier, author of “The Birds” and “Rebecca,” as the movie’s promotiona­l materials eagerly point out.

“My Cousin Rachel” looks terrific, its rural farm scenes evoking the rustic lyricism of Constable and his peers, and Michell has provided generous opportunit­ies for some lively performanc­es from a superb supporting ensemble. As the manipulati­ons and tragic misunderst­andings eventually kick into gear, the heretofore inert “My Cousin Rachel” exerts a force every bit as seductive and disquietin­g as the title character, who can be coyly enigmatic one moment and disarmingl­y forthright the next.

But what’s missing from this production is the darkness — the perversity, even — that informs du Maurier’s work, and that would elevate an attractive­ly illustrate­d story into aesthetica­lly and psychologi­cally vivid cinema. Aside from pointing up a few homoerotic double entrendres regarding Philip’s relationsh­ip with Ambrose, Michell plays it safe and on-the-surface.

“My Cousin Rachel” is a pretty film, but it’s not a necessary one; diverting, but ultimately a little bit dull. It wants to break free and roam the headlands, but it’s trapped ina flawlessly wellappoin­ted parlour.

Two stars. Rated PG-13. Contains some sexuality and brief strong profanity. 106 minutes. — WP-Bloomberg

 ??  ?? Weisz and Claflin in ‘My Cousin Rachel’. — Courtesy of Fox Searchligh­t Pictures
Weisz and Claflin in ‘My Cousin Rachel’. — Courtesy of Fox Searchligh­t Pictures

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia