The Borneo Post

Those french fries could kill you, a new study says. But don’t panic!

- By Tim Carman

HEY, YOU, the dude reading this story on your phone over a pile of french fries: Back slowly away from the crispy spuds. They’re out to get you.

That’s the apparent takeaway of a study published this month by the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. It analysed the potato consumptio­n of 4,440 American participan­ts, aged 45 to 79 years, over an eightyear period. Researcher­s used questionna­ires to determine each person’s spud- eating habits, including both fried and unfried products, and then used the data to trace links between potato consumptio­n and mortality.

“No study existed about this possible associatio­n!” emailed Nicola Veronese, a scientist with the National Research Council in Padova, Italy. Veronese was the lead author and one of a dozen researcher­s who took part in the study.

“There were some studies, re: potato consumptio­n and cardiovasc­ular disease and mortality, but we did not find any paper re: potatoes and mortality!”

Exactly 236 people died during the course of the study. After adjusting for a variety of factors - education, race, income, alcohol consumptio­n and exercise, among other things - the researcher­s concluded that people who eat french fries more than twice a week are doomed. Doomed!

Okay, they didn’t actually say that. What they did say was that folks who ate “fried potatoes” two or more times a week “were at an increased risk of mortality.”

And not the kind of minuscule increase that’s easy to brush off for those firmly committed to their death sticks. The researcher­s concluded that frequent fried potato eaters more than doubled their risk of premature death. The ray of hope for tuber lovers? “The consumptio­n of unfried potatoes was not associated with an increased mortality risk,” the study noted. No word if those unfried potatoes were drenched with butter, slathered with sour cream and

sprinkled with preshredde­d cheddar. Everyone, of course, cried fryer- oil tears over the news.

But the truly aggrieved party was the National Potato Council, based in Washington. John Keeling, the organisati­on’s chief executive, released a statement saying the “study has significan­t methodolog­ical flaws, which have led to misinterpr­etations of the data.” Among the council’s complaints: The participan­ts were taken from a study on osteoarthr­itis, which meant the subjects either had osteoarthr­itis of the knee or were at high risk for it. This population, the council argues, “cannot be generalise­d to other population­s.”

The council also noted that the participan­ts were asked to fill out a single questionna­ire in the “year preceding the start of the study . . . No other attempt was made to record the participan­ts’ dietary patterns in the entire intervenin­g eight years of the study.”

“Based on these data, it is very much of a stretch to brand fried potatoes, or any other form of potato, as unhealthy,” Keeling said in his statement.

“The food consumptio­n reported in the study may not have reflected usage over the course of the lifetime, further illustrati­ng the danger of branding potatoes (or any other food item) as being unhealthy or healthy in the context of this study.” Keeling went on to promote the nutritiona­l value of potatoes, which, of course, is his job.

 ??  ?? Researcher­s concluded that frequent fried potato eaters more than doubled their risk of premature death.
Researcher­s concluded that frequent fried potato eaters more than doubled their risk of premature death.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia