Why environmentalists against these pipelines
It’s got me worried. If something were to happen, that fracked poison would come down the river ... right into our wells. Andy Billotti, protester
HANCOCK, Maryland: The pipeline that TransCanada wants to build is short, 3.5 miles, cutting through the narrowest part of Maryland. It would duck briefly under the Potomac River at this 1,500-person town, bringing what business leaders say is much-needed natural gas to the eastern panhandle of West Virginia.
But environmentalists say that brief stretch could jeopardise the water supply for about six million people, including most of the Washington-metropolitan area.
That’s why dozens of protesters have gathered each weekend this summer at various points along the upper Potomac, part of a growing national movement that opposes both oil and natural gas pipelines and wants businesses and governments to embrace green energy instead.
Inspired by the Dakota Access oil pipeline protest at Standing Rock, North Dakota, and the broad wave of demonstrations that has energized the left since President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the protesters hope to convince Maryland Gov Larry Hogan and his environmental secretary to stop the pipeline, which got an enthusiastic green light from West Virginia.
“It’s got me worried,” said Andy Billotti, 53, who wore a T- shirt from April’s Peoples Climate March in Washington as he erected his tent at the Paw Paw Tunnel Campground near Oldtown, Maryland, for one recent protest. “If something were to happen, that fracked poison would come down the river ... right into our wells.”
Opponents gathered at the McCoys Ferry campsite in Clear Spring, Maryland, this weekend, and will be at Taylors Landing next weekend. The protest at Taylors Landing, near Sharpsburg, Maryland, is slated to include state Sen Richard S. Madaleno Jr. , D-Montgomery, a gubernatorial candidate and the latest of a handful of politicians to take part.
The activists want Hogan, who earlier this year banned fracking in Maryland, to deny TransCanada a water quality permit to cross the Potomac. Environment Secretary Ben Grumbles said the state has sought additional information about the project from the company and will schedule a public hearing on the permit application in coming weeks.
Some 40 other permits are also needed, including ones from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the National Park Service, because the pipeline would also go under the C& O Canal.
Industry and economic development officials say the pipeline is safe and sorely needed to attract new employers to the West Virginia panhandle.
“There are hundreds, if not thousands, of miles of gas lines like this in the Washington, D.C., area,” Eric Lewis, president of the Jefferson County Development Authority (JCDA), told a passionate gathering of about 60 protesters at a Shepherdstown Town Council meeting in July. “If people have issues with fracking, they should take it up somewhere else.”
West Virginia’s Public Service Commission already granted its utility, Mountaineer Gas, approval to begin building the distribution pipeline from Berkeley Springs to Martinsburg. Bulldozers are at work.
The utility plans to eventually extend that line to Charles Town and Shepherdstown. The natural gas that runs through the area’s existing pipeline is entirely spoken for since the opening of a Procter & Gamble manufacturing plant near Martinsburg, Mountaineer Gas officials said.
“You’ve got to have an industrial base to provide employment,” said West Virginia Commerce Secretary H. Wood Thrasher. “Without gas service, we are dead in the water.” He said the state has lost a “significant” number of companies interested in moving to the eastern panhandle because of the lack of natural gas service.
The JCDA has been working on getting natural gas service to the region for “decades,” said John Reisen-weber, the authority’s executive director. More recently, it has encouraged the development of renewable green energy, such as wind and solar. But manufacturers, commercial and some residential developers insist on natural gas, he said.
While gas pipelines have crisscrossed the country since the 1920s, the number of approved interstate lines has spiked in recent years, driven by the boom in natural gas extraction through hydraulic fracturing. Protests have spiked, too.
New Yorkers convinced their state environmental agency twice in the past two years to deny a water quality certificate for natural gas pipelines. Federal authorities shut down a muchcriticised Ohio pipeline in May, after 18 leaks spilled more than two million gallons of drilling fluid, adversely impacting the water quality. Catholic nuns near Lancaster, Pennsylvania, have built an outdoor chapel in an attempt to stop another pipeline.
In Virginia, two disputes over much larger proposed pipelines have become a hot-button political issue in the governor’s race.
The nation’s 2.3-million-mile pipeline network is considered the safest way to move oil, and the only feasible way to transport natural gas. Natural gas pipeline leaks are down 94 per cent since 1984, the industry says. But accidents do happen - an average of 299 significant incidents in each of the past five years, according to federal data.
TransCanada spokesman Scott Castleman noted that his firm and its predecessors have a century of experience in the region. The proposed eightinch diameter pipeline would be buried up to 100 feet beneath the riverbed, with walls twice as thick as required, and constant monitoring for leaks and surges. A dozen TransCanada pipelines safely cross the Potomac River elsewhere in Maryland, Castleman said.
While solar, wind and other renewable energy sources are growing steadily, most authorities say it will be at least 2050 before renewables provide half or more of the nation’s energy needs.