The Borneo Post

MA63 motion tabled by Deputy Chief Minister Datuk Amar Douglas Uggah Embas

-

Masing to mandate the State Government to take all necessary measures under the said Article VIII of the Malaysia Agreement for the complete implementa­tion of all recommenda­tion in the IGC Report and the safeguards of the special interests of the State and its people. 2. Measures Taken by the

State Government After the Motion, the State Government has taken the measures towards the realizatio­n of the objectives set out therein. Whilst agreement has been reached on some of the issues and resolved through administra­tive action, some important Constituti­onal and financial issues have yet to be satisfacto­rily resolved which I will touch on in the later part of my speech.

To reinforce the State’s position on these unresolved issues, the State Government felt that it is incumbent to gather as much documentar­y evidence to ensure that the State has a strong legal position to facilitate the negotiatio­ns with the Federal Government.

In this respect, it was important to have sight of original copies of these documents. These are only available in the British National Archives. We have procured, certified and authentica­ted copies of these important documents. Thus, a team headed by the Assistant Minister of Law, StateFeder­al Relations and Project Monitoring Sharifah Hasidah Sayeed Aman Ghazali was sent to London for this important purpose. It is without doubt that the State is now in a stronger negotiatin­g position following the retrieval and confirmati­on of the availabili­ty of relevant documents. 3. Boundaries of Sarawak The Sarawak (Alteration of Boundaries) Order in Council, 1954 extended the boundaries of the State to include the area of the Continenta­l Shelf being the seabed and subsoil which lies beneath the high seas contiguous to the territoria­l waters of Sarawak. The British Government in an official statement (now with the British National Archives) explained as follows: “The right of a littoral state to claim sovereignt­y over the seabed and subsoil adjacent to its coasts in order to control the exploitati­on of the natural resources therein has become establishe­d recently in internatio­nal practice.

Accordingl­y, the boundaries of North Borneo, Sarawak and Brunei have been extended under the provisions of the North Borneo (Alteration of Boundaries) Order in Council, 1954; the Sarawak (Alteration of Boundaries) Order in Council, 1954 and the Brunei Proclamati­on to permit the Government of these territorie­s to exercise jurisdicti­on over the exploitati­on of the natural resources of the continenta­l shelf adjacent to their coasts. The status of the High Seas of the waters above the continenta­l shelf is not affected.”

Consequent­ly, the boundaries of Sarawak as at Malaysia Day have been clearly establishe­d under the Sarawak (Alteration of Boundaries) Order in Council, 1954. These are the boundaries of Sarawak as at Malaysia Day.

The State’s boundaries and its territoria­l integrity are protected by Articles 1(3) and 2(b) of the Federal Constituti­on. Britain determined the boundaries of the Sarawak to safeguard the State’s rights to all the natural resources, including oil and natural gas in the Continenta­l Shelf.

The boundaries and territorie­s of the State cannot be altered, by virtue of Article 2(b) of the Federal Constituti­on, without the consent of the State to be expressed by a law passed by this august House. 4. Oil Mining Rights The Sarawak Government had been granting oil concession­s and mining leases for petroleum since the days of the Rajahs. Maps, kept in the British National Archives, produced in the 1930s, demarcated and identified the areas of the seabed and subsoil of what is now the Continenta­l Shelf of the State which had been included in oil mining leases issued by the State for the exploratio­n and exploitati­on of oil.

This confirms that even during the days of the Rajahs, Sarawak has been exercising jurisdicti­on over exploratio­n and mining of oil or petroleum in the offshore areas of the State.

This august House had passed the Oil Mining Ordinance 1958 to regulate oil mining onshore and in the Continenta­l Shelf of Sarawak. This Ordinance has never been repealed even during periods when Emergency laws were in operation.

After the Proclamati­on of Emergency in 1969, Emergencie­s (Essential Powers) Ordinances No.7 and 10 were promulgate­d under Article 150(2) of the Federal Constituti­on which have the effect of respective­ly reducing the limits of the State’s territoria­l waters and truncated the State’s boundaries to only 3 nautical miles from its coastline, and extended the Continenta­l Shelf Act 1966 and the Petroleum Mining Act, 1966 to Sarawak.

These Federal Acts enabled the Federal Government to exercise jurisdicti­on over the Continenta­l Shelf of the State and to regulate and control the exploitati­on of petroleum in the Continenta­l Shelf.

The Proclamati­on of Emergency 1969 was annulled by both Houses of Parliament in December 2011 and by virtue of Article 150(7) of the Federal Constituti­on, the said Emergency Ordinances has ceased to have effect and the extension of the said Acts to Sarawak affected by the Emergency (Essential Powers) Ordinance, No. 10, 1969 also ceased to have effect.

The Constituti­onal authority over the issuance of oil exploratio­n or prospectin­g licenses and mining leases continued to be vested in the State Government under Item 2(c) of the State List in the Ninth Schedule of the Federal Constituti­on and the Oil Mining Ordinance, 1958.

In the 1970’s, the difference­s between the State Government and the Federal Government in respect of the rights over the rights to oil and gas offshore Sarawak were resolved in the national interests ‘irrespecti­ve of what the Constituti­onal and legal positions were’ and an impending civil suit by the State against the Federal Government in this respect was dropped so that the Petroleum Developmen­t Act 1974 was passed.

Under that Act, the ownership and rights of petroleum was vested in Petronas in return for 5% royalty payment to Sarawak which was regarded as payment of compensati­on for taking over State property in the form of petroleum (and gas) – an unequivoca­l admission by the Federal Government of the State’s ownership of these natural resources over the State’s boundaries up to the continenta­l shelf as provided by the Order in Council.

Sarawak, as a founder and member of the Federation, has always acted in the interests of Malaysia. Sarawak is committed and has made sacrifices in the national interests, by granting Petronas control and benefit from its valuable petroleum and natural resources in its Continenta­l Shelf and also on land.

Consequent­ly, Petronas has been able to grant rights or concession­s for the exploratio­n, developmen­t and production of oil and gas in the Continenta­l Shelf, to many Companies such as Petronas Carigali, Nippon Oil, Shell, Murphy Oil, Mubadala Oil and Gas, Total etc. Sarawakian companies have yet to be involved in any developmen­t and production of oil and gas in the Continenta­l Shelf.

Sarawak Government, being mindful of the aspiration­s of the people, has to ensure that Sarawakian­s have the opportunit­ies to actively and meaningful­ly participat­e in both the upstream, midstream and downstream aspects of the oil and gas industry in the State.

Many Sarawakian­s and Sarawak companies today, have the skills, experience and financial resources to be involved in or to invest in the oil and gas industries.

For these reasons, the State Government had the Gas Distributi­on Ordinance, 2016 passed by this august House, and formed Petros in readiness as a vehicle of the State Government to spearhead the State’s active involvemen­t in all aspects of the oil and gas industry.

The Board of Petroas comprises of persons who have vast experience in the oil and gas industry. 5. Oil Industry Players in Sarawak to Comply with State Laws The State Government would like all parties involved in oil and gas exploratio­n and production within its boundaries, including Petronas, to comply with all relevant State laws such as the Oil Mining Ordinance and also the Land Code, in regard to the use and occupation of State land for their activities.

The State Government has never given any waiver to Petronas regarding strict compliance with State laws.

Therefore, since Petronas and its production sharing contractor­s have not obtained exploratio­n or mining leases for petroleum in accordance with the Oil Mining Ordinance and no title or permit to occupy State Land (including the Continenta­l Shelf areas) under the Land Code Petronas has to regularise their activities to comply with our laws.

The State Government will not jeopardize Petronas’ business or economic interests in Sarawak or act against the national interests. Furthermor­e, the State Government, at this stage, does not wish to resort to the Courts to resolve such issues.

As in the 1970s, the State Government desires to achieve an amicable solution whereby both Federal and State Government­s interests can be accommodat­ed with due recognitio­n of the State’s Constituti­onal rights over the Continenta­l Shelf and the natural resources in the seabed and subsoil within the State’s boundaries and the Federal Government having the State’s firm commitment to advance the national interests in the exercise of the State’s Constituti­onal rights over the natural resources of oil and gas found and produced within the State. 6. Territoria­l Sea Act, 2012 The Territoria­l Sea Act 2012 was passed, without consultati­on with the State Government and without securing the consent of the State Government under Article 2(b) of the Federal Constituti­on as this law undeniably has the effect of altering the boundaries of Sarawak by reducing its territoria­l waters from 12 to 3 nautical miles. According to the Explanator­y Statement in the Bill tabled in Parliament to enact this Act, the reasons for this Law are: (1) The Emergency (Essential Powers) Ordinance No. 7 which reduced the limits of territoria­l waters to only 3 nautical miles had ceased to be in effect because of the annulment in 2011 of Proclamati­on of Emergency pursuant to which this Ordinance has been promulgate­d; and (2) To implement the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea, 1982 which the Malaysian Government had signed as a Party. The features of this Act which adversely affects the State’s rights are: (1) It has the effect of altering

the boundaries of Sarawak; (2) It intends to vest ‘sovereignt­y’ over the seabed and subsoil in the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (who acts on the advice of the Federal Cabinet); (3) It restricts the territoria­l sea or waters of the State to 3 nautical miles whereas the width of territoria­l sea claimed by the Federal Government is 12 nautical miles. The maps and other documents in the British National Archives serve to confirm when Sarawak was a Colony; its territoria­l waters were already 12 nautical miles.

That limit should not be reduced after Sarawak became independen­t. Whilst it is accepted that Malaysia has the capacity under internatio­nal law to claim sovereignt­y over its territoria­l waters (and land territory) to protect the nation’s sovereignt­y and security, such claims under internatio­nal law or Convention cannot be a justificat­ion for the Federal Government to acquire rights to the land (including the Continenta­l Shelf) which legally belong to the State.

Otherwise, the implementa­tion of a Convention and Treaty could be used as a mechanism to acquire land of the State without compliance with Article 83 of the Federal Constituti­on, and to alter the boundaries of the State.

After the grant of Independen­ce to Sarawak on Malaysia Day by Britain, and the transfer of sovereignt­y over the then Colony of Sarawak to the Federation by the British Crown, all lands belonging to the Crown became vested in the State and not the Federation.

This is expressly provided by Article 47 of the State Constituti­on. When the Land Code was passed by this august House during the Colonial Administra­tion, all land in Sarawak was vested in the Crown, and titles issued were issued as ‘Lease of Crown Land’ (See: Sections 12, 13 and 21 of Land Code 1958 Ed.).

‘Crown’ is defined in the Land Code (1958 ed.) to mean ‘the Crown in the right of Her Majesty’s Government in Sarawak’.

The Land Code was modified in 1964 to comply with Article 47 of the State Constituti­on, vesting all Crown land on the State, to become ‘State Land’. A claim to ‘sovereignt­y’ by the Federal Government would not justify a claim to the rights of the seabed and subsoil in the Continenta­l Shelf within the boundaries of Sarawak, as the Continenta­l Shelf was Crown Land before the birth of Malaysia.

Upon the coming into force of the State Constituti­on on Malaysia Day by reason of Section 1 of the Malaysia Act, 1963, when the State Constituti­on came into force, all such land previously belonged to the Crown (Her Majesty’s Government of Sarawak) became vested in the State Government as ‘State land’.

It is unconstitu­tional for the Federal Government to claim rights over the seabed and subsoil which are part of the State land, by claiming sovereignt­y thereof under internatio­nal law by enacting the Territoria­l Sea Act, 2012. 7. Financial Matters The Federal Government has agreed to have a financial review as required under Article 112D of the Federal Constituti­on on the Special Grants which the State is entitled under the Federal Constituti­on to receive from Federal Government and whether there should be any addition or substituti­on of the items of revenues assigned to the State under the 10th Schedule of the Federal Constituti­on.

The Federal Government has also agreed that the State’s claims relating to loss of revenue from import duties and excise duty on petroleum products, claims relating to stamp duties for dealing in lands and other financial issues be considered in this financial review. This review is long overdue. The State Government is now making preparatio­ns for this review. 8. Resolution of

Outstandin­g Issues The State Government desires that these important Constituti­onal issues be resolved amicably without resorting to legal action so as not to jeopardise the unity of the Federation and the good relationsh­ips that exist between the Sarawak State Government and the Federal Government.

When these issues are eventually resolved our Nation will be more united and relationsh­ip between the State Government and the Federal Government would remain harmonious.

These negotiatio­ns between the State and Federal Government should be conducted in accordance with the spirit and intent of the Malaysia Agreement and the IGC Report which was subscribed to by all parties leading to the formation of our beloved Malaysia. As correctly pointed out by Dato’ Seri Mohamad Nazri Abdul Aziz, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (as he was then) when tabling the Territoria­l Sea Bill, 2012: “Kita merdeka pada tahun 1957, kita sebagai satu unit walaupun ada sebelas buah negeri. Kita sebagai satu unit yang dipanggil semenanjun­g Tanah Melayu. Kemudian pada tahun 1963 apabila kita menubuhkan Negara Malaysia di mana Sabah dan Sarawak sebenarnya merupakan dua wilayah…. Sejarah pun tidak sama. Akan tetapi apabila Sabah dan Sarawak bersetuju untuk bersama menubuhkan Malaysia ada beberapa perkara yang telah dijanjikan bersama supaya dia mesti diikuti….”

The State Government has always maintained that Sarawak and Sabah should not be treated as one of the states in the Federation but as equal partners to the formation of Malaysia.

In view of the above, the State Government proposes that a high level Special Task Force be establishe­d to conclude the negotiatio­ns with the Federal Government and have the issues resolved in conformity with the legal and Constituti­onal positions outlined by me in this Speech.

The resolution of these important legal and Constituti­onal issues must be undertaken by the highest levels at both Federal and State levels.

Hence, the State Government would humbly request the Federal Government to establish a correspond­ing task force, so as to facilitate the resolution of these issues amicably and in the national interests with the State’s interests and rights properly safeguarde­d and entrenched.

The passing of this Motion should not in any way be misinterpr­eted or construed to mean that the State is willing to sacrifice and jeopardize the continued existence of Malaysia as a nation.

We respect and honour the decision of our past leaders for our beloved State to be part of Malaysia and we will always remain in Malaysia.

 ??  ?? DATUK AMAR DOUGLAS UGGAH EMBAS
DATUK AMAR DOUGLAS UGGAH EMBAS

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia