The Borneo Post

Rani Mukerji in solid form in well-intentione­d ‘Hichki’

-

THERE is nothing original, nothing surprising, nothing even remotely unpredicta­ble in ‘Hichki’.

Back after a four-year hiatus, Rani Mukerji stars as a teacher who employs unconventi­onal methods to get through to her class of tough, rebellious kids in this inconsiste­nt but wellintent­ioned film. Even the fact that the teacher in question has Tourette’s – a neurologic­al disorder that causes her to break into loud, involuntar­y noises – works as a trigger to push the cliche that who better to recognise the potential in a bunch of misfits than someone who’s been misfit all her life.

Yet it’s a testament to the winning performanc­e of its leading lady that the film doesn’t collapse under the weight of that predictabi­lity. Despite borrowing ideas from a slew of films including ‘Dead Poets Society’, ‘Dangerous Minds’, and ‘Taare Zameen Par’, director Siddharth P Malhotra somehow manages to give us characters that we care for, and a story that offers comfort in the familiar.

After being passed up for jobs routinely because school authoritie­s are sceptical of her ability to handle students given her condition, Rani’s character, Naina Mathur, a trained and qualified profession­al, finally lands a job at a fancy school. But she’s assigned to a class comprising students from the nearby slums; a clutch of unwelcome, disinteres­ted kids who earned their seats due to the Right to Education mandate, but who’d rather spend their time betting, smoking, picking fights, or playing pranks to drive their teacher away.

Naina has her work cut out for her. She’s got to win over the students, find an alternate way to teach them, plus she’s got to convince the school authoritie­s – particular­ly an elitist colleague (Neeraj Kabi) – that the misfits from Class 9F don’t deserve to be written off without giving them a fair shot.

It’s a film overstuffe­d with good intentions and multiple messages. Some of these are communicat­ed with the subtlety of a sledgehamm­er. Like a scene in which Naina visits the slums where her students live, a revealing exercise which puts things into perspectiv­e for her. Other ideas, like the stigmas and the embarrassm­ent attached to a condition like Tourette’s are conveyed, frequently without the crutch of dialogue, through the relationsh­ip between Naina and her father (Sachin Pilgaonkar).

You could argue that conflicts are resolved a tad convenient­ly, and that everything ties up too neatly in the end. It makes for rousing montages and a bunch of lump-in-your-throat moments. But make no mistake this is broad-brushstrok­es filmmaking. Surprising­ly, it works. And much of it is because Rani Mukerji is in solid form, cutting a convincing portrait of an empathetic young woman who knows what it’s like to be unfairly given up on. She never turns Naina into a victim, while portraying her condition with great sensitivit­y. Watching her bring the character to life is one of the film’s great joys.

 ??  ?? Rani Mukerji (left) in a still from ‘Hichki’.
Rani Mukerji (left) in a still from ‘Hichki’.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia