McDonald’s wants deal in case that risks joint employer ruling
MCDONALD’S and the US National Labour Relations Board asked an agency judge to approve the settlement of a longrunning workplace-retaliation case, cutting short a trial that could lead to increased corporate liability for alleged wrongdoing by franchisees.
The trial, which was to resume on Monday after a two-month delay, stems from claims by McDonald’s franchise employees that they were fired for joining a national effort to obtain a US$ 15 hourly wage, the so- called Fight For US$ 15 movement backed by the Service Employees International Union. Sen Elizabeth Warren, DMassachusetts, on Saturday joined attorneys for the unionbacked Fast Food Workers Organising Committee in accusing the labour board’s Trump- appointed general counsel, Peter Robb, of wrongly rushing to settle the case on terms favourable to McDonald’s.
“Donald Trump’s NLRB is trying to railroad workers into terrible settlements and let corporations violating labour laws off the hook,” Warren said in a statement.” A settlement that provides full relief on all the substantive unfair labour practice charges at issue in this case, and that avoids years of additional litigation that would otherwise delay whatever relief is ultimately determined, is more than reasonable,” a McDonald’s attorney said in a motion filed Monday. The NLRB didn’t respond to a request for comment on the filing.
The court didn’t immediately rule on the request.
“Today’s proposal by McDonalds is not a settlement. In a real settlement, McDonald’s would take responsibility” for the alleged actions of its franchisees, said Micah Wissinger, an attorney for the Fast Food Workers Organising Committee. “We look forward to presenting our objections to the judge.” The trial began in 2016 and was nearing completion in January, when the NLRB sought a 60- day stay in hopes of securing a settlement. A key issue in the dispute is whether McDonald’s has enough control over its franchisees to be considered a “joint employer” that workers at franchised stores can bring claims against.
The settlement does not include a determination that McDonald’s is a “joint employer” of the workers. — WP-Bloomberg