Najib’s claims China to import US$2 trillion goods untrue — Guan Eng

KUALA LUMPUR: Finance Minister Lim Guan Eng yesterday hit back at ex- Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak’s claims that China had committed to import goods worth US$ 2 trillion as part of the two pipeline agreements worth RM9.4 billion as there was nothing of that sort documented.

“All officials asked have stated that these claims by Datuk Seri Najib are untrue,” Lim said.

There was no mention of the various “commitments” made by China as claimed by Najib in any of the Cabinet papers presented in 2016 and 2017, which approved the Suria Strategic Energy Resources Sdn Bhd (SSER) projects, Lim said in a statement yesterday.

“Unless of course that there are certain hidden Cabinet papers or ‘red’ Cabinet minutes that no one has access to except the former prime minister himself,” he said.

Najib, who was also the former finance minister, issued a statement on June 5, 2018 defending his administration’s award of two petrochemical and gas pipeline projects worth RM9.4 billion to China Petroleum Pipeline Bureau (CPPB) by SSER.

“Datuk Seri Najib deliberately did not focus on the principal questions surrounding RM9.4 billion pipeline scandal but instead focused on alleged purported benefits to the country from signing this RM9.4 billion contract,” the statement said.

Najib claimed that he and China’s Premier Li Keqiang “had witnessed the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding ( MOU) for the pipeline projects along with other projects while in Beijing on May 14, 2017.

“China had also committed to importing goods worth US$ 2 trillion over the next five years from Malaysia, invest up to US$150 billion in Malaysia and offer 10,000 places for training and studies in various institutes in China as part of the pipeline deal.”

“We have also discovered that for some reason, the East Coast Rail Link (ECRL) projects and the SSER projects were always presented together in the same Cabinet paper by Datuk Abdul Rahman Dahlan, the then Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department for Cabinet approval,”Lim said.

This, he said, raised red flags as the ECRL and the SSER projects were vastly different in nature and business, involving different companies, contractors and geography, even if they were financed by the same China EXIM Bank.

“DatukSeriNajibhasdeliberately refused to respond to the principal question of this RM9.4 billion scandal as to why payment of RM8.3 billion, which is equivalent to 88 per cent of the project value, was made even though only 13 per cent of progressive work had been completed,” Lim said. — Bernama