The Borneo Post

Bonham Carter and Hilary Swank invigorate otherwise dry ‘55 Steps’

- By Michael O’Sullivan

“55 STEPS” tells two stories. The fi rst is a legal drama based on the true story of Eleanor Riese, a psychiatri­c patient who, in the late 1980s, sued a San Francisco hospital for the right to refuse medication whose side effects she believed were harming her. The second is the story of the friendship that eventually grew out of her relationsh­ip with her lawyer, the patient’s rights attorney Colette Hughes.

The second of these two narrative arcs — as brought to vivid life by the pair of fi ne actresses portraying Eleanor and Colette, Helena Bonham Carter and Hilary Swank — is the more stirring.

The drama of informed consent, which was then not the law for California mental patients, opens in 1985 with a phone call from Eleanor, then a patient at St. Mary’s Hospital, to a legal-aid hotline. What is quickly laid out, under the nononsense direction of Danish fi lmmaker Bille August (“Les Miserables”), working from an at-times overly dry screenplay by Mark Rosin, are the parametres and stakes of the case. Diagnosed with paranoid schizophre­nia and mild mental retardatio­n, Eleanor simply wants the right to participat­e in a conversati­on with her doctor about the dosage and type of antipsycho­tic medication she receives. If Colette and her partner (Jeffrey Tambor) agree to take the case — and they swiftly do — Eleanor will be representi­ng 150,000 other patients. ( This fact is mentioned about four more times over the course of the fi lm, which is about four times too many.)

But while the legal manoeuvrin­g and courtroom theatrics proceed with the alternatin­g setback/ victory structure that is endemic to this sort of thing, the other

Eleanor simply wants the right to participat­e in a conversati­on with her doctor about the dosage and type of antipsycho­tic medication she receives.

fi lm — the one about the unlikely relationsh­ip between the two main characters — is quietly taking shape, with an eccentric pacing and a parcel of emotional rewards that are on a par with the film’s legal triumphs.

As Eleanor, Bonham Carter delivers a sweetly oddball performanc­e playing a highmainte­nance but fiercely determined grouch who is mostly impossible to like. Swank, for her part, is no picnic either: A former psychiatri­c nurse who discovered law later in life, her Colette is a largely charmless workaholic.

But somehow, these two difficult people are easy to watch, at least on the screen. They are honest to a fault, which is, in the end, their charm.

“You know, Eleanor, you’re not gravely disabled,” Colette tells her client and friend. “You’re gravely obnoxious.”

To which Eleanor cackles uproarious­ly in reply, as the screen crackles with the acerbic chemistry generated by this oddest of odd couples.

Two and one-half stars. Rated PG-13. Contains brief partial nudity, some mature thematic elements and disturbing images. 115 minutes.

 ?? — Courtesy of Elsani Film GmbH ?? Bonham Carter, left, and Swank as real-life patient Eleanor Riese and her lawyer, Colette Hughes, who won a landmark case for mental patients’ rights in the 1980s.
— Courtesy of Elsani Film GmbH Bonham Carter, left, and Swank as real-life patient Eleanor Riese and her lawyer, Colette Hughes, who won a landmark case for mental patients’ rights in the 1980s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia