The Star Malaysia - Star2

Missing the mark

We may not be able to go a day without our gadgets, but the tech giants we rely on aren’t above making mistakes. Here are some of the blunders that made headlines this year.

- By SUSANNA KHOO and ZAM KARIM bytz@thestar.com.my

TODAY’S thriving tech scene derives a lot of its energy and drive from the fact that everything keeps changing… and really fast too. But one of the problems with trying to quickly keep pace with the latest and greatest trends or market demands is that you sometimes get a little sloppy in the process and make a bungle of things.

Well, everyone makes mistakes, the saying goes, but some of these blunders may turn out to be rather unforgetta­ble. Here’s our compilatio­n of what we think are the most outstandin­g blunders made by all our favourite tech names over the course of this year.

But wait. Before you run through them all, do remember to take it all in the right spirit. Nobody’s perfect, as we all know, so there are great lessons here for all of us to take to heart as well.

Messed up chats

Google is a name that many of us have come to know and love. However, the company might have unwittingl­y lost some of the adoration of its fans, thanks to several faults it committed throughout 2013.

Although most of us are probably already aware of the fact that any exchanges we have online may be monitored by third parties, nothing could have prepared us for the mayhem that ensued involving Google’s GTalk and Hangout instant messaging services.

Users of both services encountere­d problems in September where their chat messages were wrongly routed to unintended recipients. There was no indication given to users that their messages were being misdeliver­ed, and most users only discovered the issue when puzzled contacts of theirs voiced it out to them.

Although the problem only lasted for several hours and was promptly resolved by Google, it was regarded as a serious privacy breach and many alarmed users took to social media outlets like Twitter to voice their concerns.

Reports on this matter observed that the problem tended to affect those on legacy Google Talk clients who were communicat­ing with contacts on the newer Google Hangouts platform. Google Apps for Business accounts were said to have been affected as well.

In fact, members of the Bytz

team faced these very same issues too at that time, and the thought of our private conversati­ons becoming more public than they were intended to be was not a particular­ly exciting one. Especially if the one who accidental­ly read your messages was in fact a person who had been mentioned in the conversati­on itself.

The cause for this blunder was never actually revealed by Google, but some believe it was due to technical issues Google faced when migrating users from GTalk to Hangouts platform. This is because a new Hangouts update had been released for the Android platform around that time.

Oops, that’s not for you

It was called App Ops, and it was a seemingly clandestin­e feature that had somehow made its way into version 4.3 (Jelly Bean) of the Android software.

Blogs like Android Police described it as “hidden feature” while internatio­nal non-profit digital rights group, Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) praised it for being “a huge advance in Android privacy” which it felt was “a necessity for anyone who wants to use the OS (operating system)” while “limiting how intrusive” mobile apps could be.

Essentiall­y, the benefit of App Ops was that it gave an Android user the ability to configure the desired level of permission for each and every app that had been installed on a particular mobile device.

In order to gain access to the App Ops menu, all that a user would have to do would be to install a third-party app such as Color Tiger’s

App Ops 4.3/4.4 KitKat or Appaholic’s Permission Manager.

This was undoubtedl­y a feature worth rejoicing over when it was discovered earlier this year, but unfortunat­ely, that joy was short lived.

Just recently, on Dec 13, Reuters reported that Google has taken this extremely useful feature out from the latest version of its Android software, version 4.4.2 (KitKat).

Calling it an accident that it had been included in the first place, Google has now left users in the lurch. They are forced to choose between either foregoing the update and missing out on security patches (the latest update includes fixes to security and denial-ofservice bugs) or upgrading to version 4.4.2 and in so doing, lose the App Ops feature altogether and no longer be able to control privacy settings at a more granular level.

“We are suspicious of this explanatio­n, and do not think that it in any way justifies removing the feature rather than improving it,” Peter Eckersley, technology projects director at EFF had said via the organisati­on’s Deeplinks blog.

We can’t help but agree with him, actually. The most that Android users can hope for is for the feature to make a comeback in a later iteration, preferably a sooner one. But, at this point, there aren’t any guarantees that this might happen at all.

Database dilemma

In yet another example of the consequenc­es of lax password encryption, Adobe became the latest victim of a massive data breach in October affecting up to a whopping 150 million users.

In a scenario reminiscen­t of Sony’s PlayStatio­n network security fiasco just two years ago, hackers managed to gain access to a vast amount of Adobe customers’ ID and encrypted passwords.

Security experts believe that this is because Adobe — which makes the popular Photoshop and Flash, amongst others — had encrypted the accounts’ passwords but not their usernames or password hints.

That opening was enough for hackers, as the visible informatio­n could be easily used to crack customers accounts because most tend to gravitate towards easyto-guess passwords like “Adobe123”, “123456” and even “password”.

Realising that the same Adobe customers could probably be using the same login and password when accessing accounts on other websites, companies like Facebook and Amazon took charge of their own user base and warned those to change their passwords too.

However, in Adobe’s case, what really angered customers was the fact that the company didn’t start sending out e-mail messages to people affected by the hack until close to a month after the news first came to light.

In what may be seen as a belated move, Adobe is now resetting the passwords of affected customers as well as notifying those whose credit or debit card informatio­n was compromise­d.

The software giant has also pledged to to offer these customers the option of enrolling in a one-year compliment­ary credit monitoring membership, where available.

 ??  ?? Blunders ahoy: The year 2013 saw plenty of gaffes committed by our favourite tech and social media giants.
Blunders ahoy: The year 2013 saw plenty of gaffes committed by our favourite tech and social media giants.
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? The replacemen­t of the blocking feature with a mute function angered users.
The replacemen­t of the blocking feature with a mute function angered users.
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? GTalk and Hangouts users had their chat messages wrongly routed to unintended recipients in September, leading to much embarassme­nt.
GTalk and Hangouts users had their chat messages wrongly routed to unintended recipients in September, leading to much embarassme­nt.
 ??  ?? adobe was hit by a massive data breach that affected 150 million users, made worse because the company didn’t encrypt the usernames or password hints.
adobe was hit by a massive data breach that affected 150 million users, made worse because the company didn’t encrypt the usernames or password hints.
 ??  ?? Google has taken the extremely useful app ops feature out from the latest version of its android software, version 4.4.2 (KitKat).
Google has taken the extremely useful app ops feature out from the latest version of its android software, version 4.4.2 (KitKat).

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia