Do we really need a Matrix reboot?
Some say the studio should choose another pill.
A REBOOT of The Matrix is said to be in the works, but many fans would rather see W arner Bros choose a different pill.
The Hollywood Reporter reported that W arner Bros is developing a relaunch of the 1999 film, which spawned two far less beloved sequels. Any new Matrix film is in such an early stage that it may – like countless other projects in development – never amount to anything. W arner Bros declined to share any details on its plans.
But the report was enough to stoke a backlash on social media over any tampering with the W achowskis’ trench-coated, slow-motion bullet-flying science-fiction creation. Reboots, you may have noticed, are a tad common for Hollywood these days. And while repaving old favourites often causes consternation among fans, the possibility of a new Matrix touched a nerve.
On one hand, the dystopian vision of The Matrix, about a rebellion against machine-controlled rule, would seem ideal for today. After all, many have recently suggested the world has tipped into a simulated reality of its own. The time may be ripe for the deep “rabbit-hole” diving Laurence Fishburne’s Morpheus advocated.
Also, initially wounded fan feelings have been known to soften under the right conditions. Get the right talent involved, secure the necessary blessings, talk about “mining” the story’s boundless “universe” and you could – come opening weekend – have a Matrix version of the The Force Awakens on your hands.
But there’s also reason to believe moviegoers are increasingly saying no to cash-grab reboots. The reasons for their demises were various, but last summer was a graveyard of underwhelming redos, including Alice Through The Looking Glass, Independence Day: Resurgence and Ghostbusters.
So why is the prospect of more Matrix particularly jarring? Here are a few reasons why:
No Wachowskis
Though they could, of course, get involved in some capacity in the future, they aren’t currently attached as directors for the new project. For many, a Matrix without Lana and Lilly W achowski – the writers and directors of all three films – is anathema. Though their subsequent movies – the Matrix sequels, Cloud Atlas and Jupiter Ascending – have been largely received as misfires, they’ve never lacked for ambition, daring or imagination. That goes double for their Netflix series Sense8.
Keanu Reeves has said their involvement is necessary for his participation in any new Matrix movie. Yet despite Reeves’ action-hero bona fides in still sterling condition (see John Wick and its sequel) and the W achowskis continually churning out sci-fi, W arner Bros is said to be exploring a different filmmaker and star. Avengers scribe Zak Penn may write the script.
Originality was the main thrill of The Matrix.
The disappointing sequels notwithstanding, The Matrix was for fans exhilaratingly current, even futuristic, in its special-effects innovation, distinctive visuals and philosophical underpinnings. A remake goes against the movie’s defining quality.
Something of a gamble, The Matrix was released in March but went on to win four Oscars and make US$463.5mil worldwide.
Among the many to decry a reboot was Full Frontal writer Travon Free, who said: “An original masterpiece called Get Out made US$113mil (RM500mil) on a US$4mil (RM17mil) budget and W arner Bros is rebooting The Matrix. Spend that money on new ideas!”
Too soon
Though quick reboots have happened before ( Spider-Man may have set the record at a mere five years), The Matrix doesn’t yet feel especially dated at 18 years old.
But as Hollywood begins veering into the 1990s for remake-ready intellectual property, Generation X is beginning to experience what has long been a constant for baby boomers. (1999’s The Blair Witch Project was also reborn last year.) As Hollywood edges closer to today to plunder evermore recent remakes, it might need Neo to find some kind of time warp, too. – AP