The Star Malaysia - Star2

The latest scam – vomit fraud

Some Uber drivers in the United States are framing their passengers.

-

The next time you are overseas and use Uber, check your bill. The trip could turn out to be expensive – not just for the distance but for a type of fraud that is on the rise.

It’s called “vomit fraud”, a scam repeatedly denounced in social networks yet still taking place around the world.

What is it? Passengers request Uber cars, which deliver them to their destinatio­n. So far so good.

But soon the passenger receives a note from Uber reporting an “adjustment” in the bill and an extra charge that can range from US$80 (RM320) to US$150 (RM600), depending on the driver’s degree of crookednes­s.

If you think that’s frustratin­g, you’re right. But the worst is still to come.

The passenger, unaware of what’s happening, tries to contact Uber. The only way to do that is through the “help” button on the company’s app or Internet page.

The first reply usually goes something like this: “I understand that it can be disconcert­ing to receive adjustment­s to the tariff after your trip ended ... In this case, your driver notified us that during your trip there was an incident in the vehicle and therefore a cleanup fee of US$150 (RM600) was added.”

The message is accompanie­d by photos of the alleged incident – vomit in the vehicle. The Uber driver had sent the images to the company, which considered them sufficient evidence to add the cleanup charge to the bill.

Uber policy is to charge US$80 (RM320) if a passenger vomits or spills a drink on the seats or any surface difficult to clean. But the charge can increase to US$150 (RM600) in cases of “significan­t quantities of body fluids (urine, blood or vomit) in the interior of the vehicle”.

Uber says the extra fees compensate the drivers for the time and money they spend cleaning their vehicles.

Uber told el Nuevo Herald that it is “actively looking into reports where fraud may be detected and will take appropriat­e actions on those accounts”.

The company added it did not have specific numbers on fraud cases but that “the vast majority of cleaning fee reports are legitimate­ly the result of someone making a mess in the car. In the instances where we find a confirmed case of fraud, we take appropriat­e action.

“With 15 million trips a day, Uber is unfortunat­ely not immune to these types of incidents.”

So what happens if there was never any vomit?

Some passengers have to send three or four e-mails to resolve their complaints. They must tell Uber that there was no incident, and then wait for the company to investigat­e and, if it agrees, reimburse their money.

Several victims told el Nuevo Herald about their vomit fraud cases. “I requested an Uber from Wynwood to the edgewater area. At one point the driver told me a road was closed and that he could drop me off near my destinatio­n to avoid an extra charge. I agreed and got off,” Miami resident Andrea Perez said about one trip last year.

But the next day Uber e-mailed her a bill with an additional US$98 (RM398) cleanup charge. It included a photo of vomit on the seat of the SUV she had used.

“I immediatel­y contacted Uber through the app. I told them that I was alone, sober, that I was not carrying any drinks and that it was impossible for me to have caused that damage,” she said. “But every new e-mail from Uber came from a different representa­tive and always favoured the driver.”

Despite several e-mail exchanges, Uber never agreed to reimburse her the extra money. But she disputed the charge with her credit card company and got back her US$98 (RM398). Uber then cancelled her account.

William Kennedy, another Miami resident, said he was a victim of vomit fraud. Twice on the same night.

Kennedy took one Uber from Midtown to the SLS hotel on Brickell Avenue, and another later from the SLS to a club in Wynwood. Neither trip cost more than US$20 (RM80), he said.

But the next day Uber sent him an e-mail notifying him that it had added two US$150 (RM600) charges to his bill because he had vomited in both vehicles.

“It was a total fraud by two different drivers. They have everything planned for the fraud,” Kennedy said.

Kennedy tried to explain to Uber that he was a victim of two frauds, but it took “numerous e-mails” to persuade the company to agree to cancel the charges and reimburse US$300 (RM1,200) to his credit card.

 ?? — TNS ?? Victims of ‘vomit fraud’ find out they’ve been scammed after Uber tacks a charge onto their bill.
— TNS Victims of ‘vomit fraud’ find out they’ve been scammed after Uber tacks a charge onto their bill.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia