The Star Malaysia - Star2

Side effects of sharing stories

-

ON social media, everything is often – if not all the time – a question of appearance, and users don’t hesitate to show a different side online to make themselves look “better” or smarter.

Now, research suggests that sharing news articles can improve a user’s self-confidence – even if they haven’t read a single line of the story.

According to a study carried out by the Customer Insight Group for the New York Times, sharing informatio­n online allows users to feel more involved in the world and to give off a better image of themselves.

Out of 2,500 people surveyed, 68% even said that doing so allowed them to give people a better idea of who they are and what interests them.

“Our research shows that this new informatio­n-sharing environmen­t may also be transformi­ng the way we understand ourselves.

“When we share informatio­n on social media, we aren’t just sharing news – we are also sharing an image of who we are and what we know.

“Our research shows that the signals our behaviour sends to others can influence the way we see ourselves; we begin to see ourselves as we believe we are seen by others,” said Dr Adrian Ward, assistant professor of marketing at the University of Texas.

So could sharing news stories improve people’s own selfpercep­tion? So suggests a study published in July 2022 in the Journal Of Consumer Psychology.

The simple fact of sharing informatio­n apparently makes people feel more confident and, above all, more knowledgea­ble about the informatio­n shared, even if they have only read the headline of the article.

Only 28% of those surveyed described reading an entire article before sharing it on social networks, while 25% admitted to reading just a few lines.

According to a separate study conducted by the same researcher­s, people who had shared an article, even if they had not read it, had a better perception of their knowledge of a subject, and thus considered themselves more informed in that area.

This flawed self-perception can lead people to believe that they are more legitimate in sharing informatio­n and giving advice, sometimes leading to the spread of false informatio­n.

“Given that news sharers gain subjective – not necessaril­y objective – knowledge, and that these people are likely to further share news, it is possible that they contribute to the spread of false or misleading informatio­n,” Dr Kim Dam Hee, assistant professor of communicat­ion at the University of Arizona, told Medical News Today.

“Feeling more knowledgea­ble than we really are may have harmful consequenc­es not just for people’s personal behaviour but also for their ability to communicat­e with others and function as a society,” Ward said.

 ?? — afp relaxnews ?? only 28% of those surveyed described reading an entire article before sharing it on social networks.
— afp relaxnews only 28% of those surveyed described reading an entire article before sharing it on social networks.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia