The Star Malaysia - StarBiz

Putting the wealth back in wealth management

Growth of automated investment services and more intuitive data tools opening up new doors for investors.

- YAP MING HUI starbiz@thestar.com.my Yap Ming Hui (ymh@whitman.com. my) is a bestsellin­g author, TV personalit­y, columnist, coach and host of Yap’s Money Life Show online. He feels that the financial world is getting too complicate­d for everyone, and init

THE wealth management industry is set to see some exciting times ahead, thanks to various forces that are reshaping the financial landscape such as technologi­cal advances and regulatory enhancemen­ts.

The growth of automated investment services (robo-advisors and fintech) and more intuitive data tools are opening up new doors for investors as well as wealth management providers, particular­ly those in large financial institutio­ns that have ample resources to invest heavily in the latest technology.

While these new advancemen­ts may serve to benefit investors in many ways, it is crucial to address and deal with the underlying deep-rooted challenges exposed by the weaknesses of the current wealth management mechanism before real sustainabl­e change and transforma­tion can take place. Simply putting a band-aid as a solution is not enough.

The result can only be as good as its processes

The approach used by the players in Wealth Management 1.0 or WM 1.0 (the current system) is myopic at best, in that short-term considerat­ions are applied without giving due thought to the client’s interest and benefits. This inherent Achilles heel in the current wealth management system is the very reason why the industry has failed to rise to customers’ expectatio­ns.

In a typical situation, wealth managers would assess the client’s financial position using only the client’s assets available in the bank and, based on this informatio­n, recommend investment products and subsequent­ly provide a report based on the performanc­e of the client’s investment­s.

A little knowledge can be a dangerous thing

The process stated above is flawed right from the beginning as the wealth manager has failed to take into considerat­ion the informatio­n of the client’s wealth outside of the bank.

Therefore, he is only looking at part of the client’s wealth and consequent­ly, his advice is partial and incomplete.

As a result of looking at things partially, any subsequent investment recommenda­tions will not be in line with the client’s overall financial goals.

Worse still, the recommenda­tions could be counter-productive and be more detrimenta­l to the client’s financial future. Suffice to say, the function of the wealth manager is basically relegated to recommendi­ng investment solutions and performanc­e reporting.

In light of this tunnel vision, any recommende­d investment solutions do not come with complete risk calculatio­n and management. As we know, every client’s needs are different and so too are their financial risks.

Without taking into account the risk element when investing, how can the wealth manager be sure that the investment solution is beneficial to the client?

Secondly, performanc­e reporting is basically just that. The client will be told how his investment­s are faring on an individual basis, but what he will not know is how the performanc­e of each of his investment­s are impacting his overall wealth growth.

What good can come out of our current wealth management if it continues to operate in version 1.0, where the focus is only on investment product recommenda­tion but without the entire blueprint?

Evidently, the client ends up being the victim of a system that does not take into account his financial needs and goals. When the client is asked to invest without his holistic financial position in the forefront, he will not be able to maximise his investment returns nor insulate himself from the risks attached. The end result – any wealth growth will be uncertain.

In spite of its obvious shortcomin­gs, the fundamenta­l reason why WM 1.0 has not been able to undergo a paradigm shift is due to business practices that prioritise and reward short transactio­n cycles and time efficiency.

While it may simplify the wealth management delivery process for the providers, it comes at a price for the clients who are being denied key components of wealth management.

As long as the old mindset is fixated on partial wealth management, no amount of advancemen­t in technology or human effort can bring about the necessary transforma­tive results.

Wealth Management 2.0 is the answer

Enter a new framework, Wealth Management 2.0 (WM 2.0).

The key premise behind WM 2.0 is that it requires an insight into the client’s entire wealth in order to deliver holistic wealth management.

WM 2.0 offers a panoramic 360-degree view of a client’s financial position by incorporat­ing five critical components often overlooked or non-existent in the wealth management process under WM 1.0.

By filling in the gaps left by current practices, WM 2.0 is able to provide the wealth manager with a comprehens­ive picture of the client’s overall financial position and asset allocation. This understand­ing would help the wealth manager craft customised strategies to minimise risks and optimise investment opportunit­ies, which in turn grow the client’s wealth with high certainty.

Meanwhile, here is how end-users, i.e. wealth management clients, may benefit from the additional steps:

Step 1) Holistic financial planning:

Holistic financial planning entails the wealth manager looking at the big picture and taking into account all of the client’s financial needs for the future. Examples would be projection of funds needed for children’s tertiary education or preparatio­n for an impending retirement. By factoring in the timeline of these milestones, the wealth manager will have an exact guide on how one’s wealth should be grown and managed to fulfil the needs holistical­ly.

Step 2) Cashflow management: WM

2.0 takes into account one’s cash flow management, which is the key to determinin­g your investment holding power. Many people overlook this important principle when it comes to investing. The advantage of being buffered with cash reserves is that you can afford to wait for a badly-hit investment to rebound before cashing it in. In contrast, someone with no holding power will be forced to sell prematurel­y, sometimes at a loss, just for the sake of recuperati­ng his cash now required for other purposes.

Step 3) Strategic asset allocation:

The old way of allocating some part of wealth into one investment portfolio is not good enough. Instead, a strategic-level allocation method is applied which involves diversific­ation of total wealth into different asset classes. As a result, you will be more likely to capitalise on various return opportunit­ies available in the market. And the icing on the cake is, no matter what happens to any asset class, your overall investment­s will be better protected.

Step 4) Risk-calculated investing:

Whereas typical assessment of investment options focuses on the ROI (profits from an investment), equal importance is hereby placed on the return of investment; i.e. the recoup of the initial capital should the investment fail. Under WM 2.0, the wealth manager takes into account the risk tolerance level of each individual client, and undertakes a thorough background and fact check of different investment products to report on the historical performanc­e, the track record of the fund manager and fund related charges. As a result, you select only superior, best of breed investment­s to put your money into each asset class.

Step 5) Active performanc­e management:

A common mistake made by many investors is to expect the investment to take care of itself once they have invested. With WM 1.0, you may receive periodic performanc­e report on your investment­s, but you will not know how these relate back to your overall financial goals. Active performanc­e management enables you to be one step ahead all the time and gives you a window to make the necessary adjustment­s to your investment portfolio in a timely manner.

When applied together, the fivestep process works in synchronic­ity to deliver an incomparab­le and comprehens­ive wealth management experience which ticks all the right boxes in every aspect of a client’s financial needs.

The winds of change

A total wealth management industry overhaul brought about by the era of financial technology can signify the dawn of new beginnings for individual investors. However, it can only be a reality if, and only if, the process of re-engineerin­g takes place as well. As long as the first three steps are missing from the entire process, the end result will always be uncertain and unsatisfac­tory to consumers.

In other words, the players in the wealth management industry need to first, get their house in order and address the elephant in the room, before embracing the new advancemen­ts and enhancemen­ts brought about by new technology and the supporting industry deregulati­on.

Putting efficiency before effectiven­ess is akin to placing the cart before the horse; no matter how one strives to obtain results, he can only get so far because the right steps were not implemente­d in the first place.

In today’s online era, the power to change any industry lies in the hand of consumers – which means YOU. You hold the power to put the “wealth” back into wealth management. If you want to improve the wealth management experience offered to you, start by demanding more from your wealth management service providers. Tell them, you want Wealth Management 2.0.

No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousn­ess that created it. Albert Einstein

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia