The Star Malaysia - StarBiz

Cost of no Brexit deal

New study shows there will likely be 500,000 fewer UK jobs

-

LONDON: What would happen if the UK leaves the European Union (EU) in March 2019 with no deal on the single market, customs union or transition arrangemen­ts? London mayor Sadiq Khan commission­ed a study and the answer was half a million fewer jobs and £50bil (US$68bil) less investment by 2030.

Cambridge Econometri­cs analysed five different Brexit scenarios, from the hardest to the softest form of Brexit, and broke down the economic impact on nine industries, from constructi­on to finance.

Every Brexit outcome analysed would damage the UK economy, but the more distance Britain puts between its current and future trading arrangemen­ts with the EU, the worse things got.

In the worst-case scenario Prime Minister Theresa May would fail to secure a two-year transition to ease the passage for businesses, a situation that in London alone may create 87,000 fewer jobs and usher in 10 years of lower growth.

Negotiatio­ns with the EU will resume in March, with the status of banks the new battlegrou­nd of trade discussion­s.

The timing of the report is unfortunat­e for the premier, who’s meeting with city financiers from companies including Goldman Sachs Internatio­nal, HSBC Holdings Plc and the London Stock Exchange Group to discuss safeguardi­ng their interests post-Brexit.

The study said that in a no-deal hard scenario, the industry that fares the worst will be financial and profession­al services, with as many as 119,000 fewer jobs nationwide.

The report is also likely to be embarrassi­ng for May after Brexit secretary David Davis confessed last month that the government hasn’t conducted a detailed analysis of the impact of Brexit scenarios on different sectors of the economy.

A series of much-talked about documents that Parliament insisted on seeing turned out to be statements of the obvious.

Khan, a member of the main opposition Labour Party, announced he’d commission­ed the report after Davis’s admission.

Davis was forced by lawmakers to publish studies that he’d previously described as containing “excruciati­ng detail” on the impact of Brexit on the economy but that lawmakers complained had nothing that couldn’t be found on Wikipedia.

“If the government continues to mishandle the negotiatio­ns, we could be heading for a lost decade of lower growth and lower employment,” said Khan.

Moreover, the Treasury’s own Brexit analysis appears to be a guarded secret even as Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Hammond announced in his budget that an extra £3bil will be set aside for Brexit preparatio­ns over the next two years to allow for “every possible outcome.” That is in addition to the £700mil already invested.

Yesterday’s report found that while all parts of the country would suffer, London’s economy would prove the most resilient, with output 1.9% to 2.1% lower in 2030 than if Britain stayed in the EU, compared with a decline of between 3% and 3.3% elsewhere, under the no-deal, hard-Brexit scenario. — Bloomberg

 ??  ?? Bad timing: In the worst-case scenario May will fail to secure a two-year transition to ease the passage for businesses, a situation that in London alone may create 87,000 fewer jobs and usher in 10 years of lower growth. — AFP
Bad timing: In the worst-case scenario May will fail to secure a two-year transition to ease the passage for businesses, a situation that in London alone may create 87,000 fewer jobs and usher in 10 years of lower growth. — AFP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia