PBoC’s money-fund headache
While being an option to stocks, they effectively raise borrowing costs
SHANGHAI: China’s ever-growing money market funds pose an increasing problem for the nation’s central bank as policymakers attempt to boost the flow of credit to cushion an economic slowdown.
While the funds have offered savers a handy alternative to risky stocks and once high-flying wealth management products, they’re effectively raising borrowing costs.
That’s because, with some 8.6 trillion yuan (US$1.3 trillion) according to the Asset Management Association of China, they’re sapping the flow of savings to banks, which in turn are having to pay the funds higher rates when taking their cash as deposits.
Those higher costs are being passed along to borrowers, countering the efforts of the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) to reduce lending rates for small and medium-sized companies in particular. And the bargaining power of money funds is growing – the assets are close to the personal deposits at Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd, the world’s largest lender by assets.
“Investors’ risk tolerance has been falling amid weak stock and bond market performances,” so they’ve been turning to money-mar- ket funds, said Nie Wen, a Shanghaibased economist at Huabao Trust Co. “The money market funds’ investments may not necessarily end up in the hands of medium and small enterprises.”
It was a lot simpler years ago, when Chinese households had few options other than bank deposits and regulators set the rates on those savings pools. That allowed the PBoC to easily cut funding costs for banks; the central bank also set the lending rate.
“While policymakers only needed to focus on the banking system to boost lenders’ willingness to loan, they now face bigger challenges and need more measures to achieve the same goal, given the size of such funds,” said Xia Le, Hong Kongbased chief Asia economist at Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA.
The pressure on banks’ loan-creation engine was evident in data last week. New yuan loans in August fell short of forecast. And the aggregate lending figure, including shadow banking, showed borrowers are increasingly having to turn to the debt market.
Sales of short-term bills by non-financial companies surged to the highest since February 2009. With bond yields on the rise, thanks in part to record default rates, borrowers are increasingly stuck.
One sign of the impact of tougher credit conditions came last Friday, with data showing the smallest gain in investment spending on record. China could have a new round of supportive measures to stabilise investments, the Economic Information Daily reported yesterday, without saying where it got the information.
The PBoC offered no immediate response to a fax seeking comment about the funds’ growth affecting efforts to support loans.
Savers have plenty of reason to keep turning to money-market funds, after the Shanghai Composite Index of stocks tumbled into a bear market and bond defaults made credit a risky option. The market expanded 12% in July, up 28-fold from 2013, Asset Management Association of China data show.
The world’s biggest fund, Yu’EBao, illustrates the challenge for policymakers. It has 62% of its 1.45 trillion yuan in bank deposits and 9.4% in bonds – mostly sovereign and policy-bank notes, according to the latest report posted on the website of Tianhong Asset Management Co, which manages Yu’EBao.
Authorities have appeared to recognise the issue, last year asking Alibaba Group Holding Ltd’s Ant Financial affiliate, which holds a majority of the Yu’EBao manager, to cut the maximum amount individuals can invest in it.
Other funds have taken action more recently, with Harvest Fund Management Co starting to curb daily aggregate subscriptions for each account from August, after Penghua Fund Management Co started doing so in July.
The main consideration is to ensure healthy development of fund performance and size so that investors’ interest can be protected, according to an e-mailed reply from Harvest Fund Management when asked about the reasons behind the change. Tianhong and Penghua declined to comment.
“While these products do bring convenience and become good investments for households, the economy hasn’t benefitted, and it even brings risks to the financial system,” said BBVA’s Xia.
“This has caught regulators’ attention,” and their guidance might be behind the recent curbing measures, he said. — Bloomberg