Mixed reaction for limited apartment ownership
Proposal raises concerns about its impact on market
It was necessary to have an appropriate approach with a specific roadmap and transparent regulations, which would help diversify the housing market.
HANOI: Mixed opinions are emerging around the Vietnam Ministry of Construction’s proposal of setting limited terms for apartment ownership, which were repeated in the latest draft amendments to the Law on Housing.
In the draft, which the ministry recently made public for comments, the ministry added a new section on “term for apartment ownership” with two options.
In the first option, the term for apartment ownership would be defined based on the lifespan of the building.
In the second option, there would be no change, meaning that there would be no regulation about the ownership term.
Experts said that it was essential to give careful consideration to the proposal of limiting apartment ownership terms because this was a new thing in Vietnam and could have a significant impact on the market and residents.
The view of the first option was similar to the proposal setting a limited term of 50 to 70 years for apartment ownership raised four months ago which had caused a stir among the public.
Most residents and experts did not agree with the proposal, pointing out that a limited term for apartment ownership was not appropriate for buildings that were developed on long-term residential land as apartment owners still had the right to own the land in the long term following the established land laws.
Van Quang, who lives in an apartment building in Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City, said that his family saved up for 10 years to buy the apartment. He was worried he would lose his biggest asset when the ownership term expired.
Another resident said that he planned to sell a house to buy an apartment close to the city centre which was more convenient for travelling to work.
However, when he heard about the ministry’s proposal, he changed his mind.
If the proposal was passed, people might rush to buy land instead of apartments and this would cause a problem for the market, he said.
According to David Jackson, general director of property market research firm Colliers Vietnam, in any approach, the Ministry of Construction aimed for stable growth of the real estate market, and clarifying issues related to house ownership and ownership terms was an important part of the process.
It was necessary to have an appropriate approach with a specific roadmap and transparent regulations, which would help diversify the housing market and open up more opportunities for customers and real estate developers, he said.
Limited-term apartment ownership is currently applied in many countries in the world but is a completely new thing in Vietnam, thus, careful consideration was needed to harmonise benefits and achieve long-term development goals, he said.
Limited terms for apartment ownership were expected to tackle difficulties in urban development and management, he said.
He pointed out that like most other types of housing properties, the quality of apartment buildings gradually decreased after many years, affecting the safety and life of residents.
He said applying limited ownership terms would also bring many opportunities for redevelopment and change of land use purposes, thereby better serving social needs in the future while providing access to housing for the next generations as land was a finite resource.
Nguyen Duy Thenh, chairman of Global Home, said that it was important to have solutions to handle construction works that expired and ownership issues to protect the legitimate rights of residents.
If the buildings had to be demolished and rebuilt, the old owners should have the right to receive compensation at market prices to settle down, he said, stressing that every building had its lifespan and would degrade over time.