Play­wright did not steal the Grinch

The Star Malaysia - - World -

NEW YORK: A New York play­wright has con­vinced a fed­eral judge that his new play is a par­ody of Dr Seuss’ clas­sic How the Grinch Stole Christ­mas! (pic) and that in this le­gal fight, he was in the right.

US District Judge Alvin Heller­stein in Man­hat­tan on Fri­day ruled that Matthew Lom­bardo’s Who’s Hol­i­day! trans­formed the “utopic” and “cheery” de­pic­tions in Grinch so com­pletely that it qual­i­fied as a “par­ody” and “fair use”.

Heller­stein re­jected ar­gu­ments by Dr Seuss En­ter­prises LP that Lom­bardo’s play in­fringed its copy­rights to the late au­thor’s work.

Who’s Hol­i­day! was slated to open Off Broad­way last Novem­ber be­fore its run was can­celled.

Lom­bardo’s lawyer Jor­dan Green­berger said his client in­tends for an­other pro­duc­tion of Who’s Hol­i­day to be­gin run­ning as soon as Novem­ber.

Grinch is about a grouchy, cave-dwelling mon­ster who de­cides to end Christ­mas, but has a change of heart af­ter be­ing in­ter­rupted by a lit­tle girl, Cindy Lou.

The Cindy Lou in Who’s Hol­i­day! is less en­dear­ing. She’s a pro­fane 45-year-old woman strug­gling with al­co­hol and sub­stance abuse, and she spent time in prison for mur­der­ing the Grinch, who was once her hus­band and fa­thered her daugh­ter.

Dr Seuss En­ter­prises ac­cused Lom­bardo of ex­ploit­ing the char­ac­ters and themes of Grinch be­cause he was too lazy to try “work­ing up some­thing fresh”.

But the judge said Lom­bardo turned the sac­cha­rine de­pic­tions of Who-Ville into an ob­ject of ridicule, where green beasts im­preg­nate women, pa­parazzi “run ra­bid”, and cit­i­zens get high on “Who Hash” to avoid life’s daily has­sles.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia

© PressReader. All rights reserved.