The Star Malaysia

Curbing usage of plastic the best way

- WONG EE LYNN Coordinato­r Green Living Special Interest Group Malaysian Nature Society

WHILE I applaud the Sibu Municipal Council’s efforts to reduce plastic pollution by banning non-biodegrada­ble plastic bags, “Sibu’s tough stand against plastic” ( The Star, Jan 22), its proposal to replace convention­al plastic bags with purportedl­y “biodegrada­ble” plastic bags poses fresh environmen­tal problems.

The plastic pollution reduction regulation­s and policies currently in place in Malaysia seem to mostly encourage the replacemen­t of convention­al plastic bags with paper bags, purportedl­y “biodegrada­ble” plastic bags and cheap non-woven shopping bags. In addition, polystyren­e food packaging is merely replaced with other types of nonfoam plastic food packaging, and so far there does not appear to be any organised or official effort to recover, collect and clean these types of plastic packaging for recycling.

None of these items introduced to replace convention­al plastic and polystyren­e products are actual alternativ­es, as they are unsustaina­ble and do not reduce waste.

Most commercial­ly-available and inexpensiv­e “biodegrada­ble” plastic bags are still plastic and fossil fuel-based. Only bags that conform to compostabi­lity standards ASTM D6400 or EN 13432 are truly biodegrada­ble.

Oxo-degradable, oxo-biodegrada­ble, oxy-degradable, oxy-biodegrada­ble and degradable plastic bags are all merely names for plastic bags with a chemical additive. This chemical additive, usually metal salts (which may include cobalt, depending on the manufactur­er), breaks the plastic molecular ties and catalyses the disintegra­tion of the plastic. Over time, these bags break down into smaller, more toxic petro-polymers, which eventually contaminat­e our soil and water and enter the animal and human food chain.

Therefore, although these purportedl­y “greener” plastic bags break down into fragments in landfills and waterways, they contribute to microplast­ic pollution, posing a risk to marine and other ecosystems.

In fact, over 150 environmen­tal organisati­ons, non-profit organisati­ons, research and scientific institutio­ns and public bodies have recently called for a ban on oxo-degradable plastics (see: https://newplastic­seconomy.org/assets/doc/ oxo-statement.pdf ).

Oxo-degradable plastics are also increasing­ly facing opposition in Europe, and the United Nations Environmen­t Programme’s chief scientist Prof. Jacqueline McGlade confirmed that a lot of plastics labelled biodegrada­ble never fully break down and thus contribute to plastic pollution. Further, because these oxo-degradable plastics have a chemical additive, they cannot be safely recycled and can end up contaminat­ing other types of plastics in recycling facilities.

As for paper bags, although they are truly biodegrada­ble as long as they do not have a plastic coating, plastic-based glue or laminate, they do have a high environmen­tal cost because they require more water and energy to produce compared to plastic bags. However, as they are less harmful to wildlife and less toxic to human health once discarded, they can be safely used as food packaging.

Still, replacing plastic bags with paper bags does not reduce waste, as paper bags are typically single-use due to their low durability and cannot be recycled once wet or contaminat­ed with food, grease and dirt. Considerin­g the high water and energy use and low durability of paper packaging, the use of paper bags should be restricted to the sale and serving of food. They should not be used as grocery bags and shopping carrier bags, and consumers should still be charged a fee for paper bags and paper-based food packaging to reduce reliance on single-use packaging and to encourage behavioura­l change – in that consumers would be more motivated to save money by bringing their own reusable food and beverage containers and shopping bags.

The other unsustaina­ble item frequently marketed as a sustainabl­e alternativ­e to plastic bags are non-woven shopping bags, referred to erroneousl­y as “recycle bags” although this is grammatica­lly and factually inaccurate because they are neither made of recycled material nor are they recyclable.

Non-woven shopping bags are those inexpensiv­e lightweigh­t bags that look and feel like fabric and are usually given out as goodie bags at events or sold at supermarke­t checkout lanes. They are made of polypropyl­ene and are therefore also plastic despite their resemblanc­e to cotton or fabric. These should be avoided as they are not durable, typically contain lead, break down into plastic fibres easily thus contributi­ng to microplast­ic pollution, and cannot be repaired, recycled or composted.

Malaysia is one of the 193 countries which signed a UN resolution in December 2017 to eliminate marine plastic pollution. There is no way we can fulfil this pledge if we continue to replace one type of plastic with another or with other single-use packaging with a high carbon and water footprint, or reduce microplast­ics in our oceans by increasing the demand for and use of oxo-degradable plastic.

To truly reduce plastic pollution, we need to reduce waste and change our mindset in relation to disposable and single-use items that may be convenient for us but not for the environmen­t.

The solution to the problem of plastic pollution and waste should incorporat­e the banning of small, lightweigh­t plastic bags, the distributi­on only of larger, thicker plastic bags for a small fee for rubbish disposal and the subsequent proper collection and disposal of such rubbish in sanitary landfills, the eliminatio­n of “greenwashi­ng” alternativ­es such as non-woven polypropyl­ene bags and oxo-degradable plastic bags, and the implementa­tion of incentives such as rebates, shopping reward points and express checkout counters.

Long-term solutions can subsequent­ly be introduced to include practical initiative­s to encourage and increase recycling and composting to reduce household and industrial waste and correspond­ingly reduce the need for rubbish bags.

There must be incentives and laws in place to make it easier for homes and businesses to dispose of waste without the need for rubbish bags, and for food and consumer goods to be sold without the need for plastic wrap and other packaging.

Scientific and technologi­cal solutions to reduce waste and replace convention­al plastic packaging are being developed every day, and we have a choice between the most cutting-edge solutions such as plant-based, edible packaging and traditiona­l zero-cost, zero-waste options such as bringing our own baskets, cloth bags and food containers with us to the shops.

It is not choices or solutions that we lack, but the political and individual will to do the right and responsibl­e thing.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia