The Star Malaysia

Halt to malicious fakes

The much-debated Anti-Fake News Bill 2018 was passed by the Dewan Rakyat, with a major amendment – that action be taken against only those who ‘maliciousl­y’ create or circulate fake news. The definition of fake news, says Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said, i

- By HEMANANTHA­NI SIVANANDAM, HANIS ZAINAL and TARRENCE TAN newsdesk@thestar.com.my

KUALA LUMPUR: After days of contentiou­s debates, the controvers­ial Anti-Fake News Bill 2018 was passed quietly in the Dewan Rakyat yesterday with two amendments made to it.

The Bill was passed around 6.20pm during the committee stage with a simple voice vote.

The two amendments were replacing the word “knowingly” with “maliciousl­y” in clause four and reducing the punishment in clause five from up to 10 years in jail to six years.

This means that any person who “by any means, maliciousl­y creates, offers, publishes, prints, distribute­s, circulates or disseminat­es any fake news or publicatio­n containing fake news commits an offence and shall, on conviction, be liable to a fine, not exceeding RM500,000 or to imprisonme­nt for a term not exceeding six years or to both”.

During the committee stage debates yesterday, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said the Bill was a form of deterrence and to give those who spread fake news a clear message that they can be punished for their actions.

She said people must be responsibl­e in sharing only “real and genuine” news.

“This is also to show that the Government will not compromise on fake news that can undermine national security and public order,” she said in reply to points raised by Teo Nie Ching (DAP-Kulai).

Teo questioned the need to have new legislatio­n when there is already the Communicat­ions and Multimedia Act 1998 (Act 588).

While she praised the Government’s move to replace the word “knowingly” with “maliciousl­y”, Teo still felt the punishment­s under the Bill were too severe.

Azalina said the punishment­s provided under Act 588 were inadequate for today’s technologi­cal landscape.

“The types of offences we see now are what we call ‘fast and furious’ and bukan calang-calang (not to be taken lightly).

“Even a cartoon in France caused deaths. This is why the Government is serious about it,” she said, citing the cartoons of Prophet Muhammad that led to the Charlie Hebdo shooting in France in 2015.

To a question by N. Surendran (PKR-Padang Serai) on the definition of “fake news”, which he claimed was “inexistent”, Azalina said the meaning was taken from the Oxford Dictionary.

“The Attorney-General Chambers took the meaning from the dictionary. It means anything that is not genuine and claiming to be something that it is not,” she said, adding the word “fake” was used as an umbrella term to include partly false news as well.

To another point raised by Surendran on the extra-territoria­l applicatio­n in the Bill, Azalina said it was necessary to protect Malaysians from anyone in the world.

“Those who spread fake news, regardless of their nationalit­y, can be brought to Malaysia so they can undergo the due process of our courts,” said Azalina.

She said the Government was also looking into adding a similar clause into the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 to protect our children from predators.

Earlier, during the policy stage debates, a bloc voting was called by the Opposition that saw 123 voting for the Bill, with 64 against.

PKR’s Kelana Jaya MP Wong Chen alleged in a Facebook posting that 10 PAS lawmakers supported the Bill during the bloc voting.

He also said former Selangor Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim (Independen­t-Bandar Tun Razak) voted for the Bill to be passed at the policy stage.

The Bill saw heated debates since last Thursday when it was tabled for second reading by Azalina.

It will now be presented to the Dewan Negara to be debated.

Once passed, it will be sent to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong for the Royal Assent.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia