The Star Malaysia

Are we prepared for the zombie apocalypse? US actually is... sort of

- By STEPHEN L. CARTER

ARE we properly prepared for the zombie apocalypse?

Okay, you’re thinking that’s just science fiction. It could never happen, so why bother getting ready? But after watching some of the frenzied television coverage of the recent natural disasters, I’m not so sure. Reporters kept asking each other who’s to blame for the fact that cities and states were so poorly prepared.

The usual academic wisdom is that if we prepare for every lowprobabi­lity event, we’ll bankrupt ourselves. Only hindsight bias insists that the signs of every unlikely catastroph­e were always there. But it’s a hindsight bias to which we cling, venting our fury at those who didn’t put the clues together. So in the highly unlikely event that the zombie apocalypse happens, journalist­s and commentato­rs, from their fortified redoubts, will certainly be demanding to know why nobody planned for this eventualit­y.

Happily, we have an answer: The US military is on the case. Seriously. Well, sort of seriously. On the website of the US Strategic Command, you can find CONPLAN 8888-11, a detailed plan for “counter-zombie dominance” prepared by a group of junior officers as part of a training exercise. The document, which came to public attention a few years ago, is festooned with disclaimer­s, including a large red box screaming that the assignment was based on a “completely fictitious scenario” – but presumably the disclaimer­s would themselves be disclaimed in any congressio­nal hearing attempting to fix blame in the event of an actual zombie invasion.

Once we take the plan seriously, it makes interestin­g reading.

Were its advice followed on screen, we wouldn’t see the US military so easily swept aside in a zombie invasion.

That’s the term used again and again in the document – “invasion” – and surely it’s the most accurate way to conceptual­ise the disaster that would follow a zombie infection. Undead hordes shambling through the streets should be treated the way one would treat any other invaders. This means the goals must be to protect the uninfected population and to eliminate the invaders.

Zombies can’t be deterred or bargained with, so they must be destroyed. The immediate difficulty is the same one that worries their television and film counterpar­ts: “Zombie forces will become stronger with each human casualty,” because “each human casualty will become a zombie.”

Therefore it’s important to create hardened protected sites and to guard critical infrastruc­ture. Because zombies will be drawn to human population centers and

can’t swim (or can they?), roads should be blocked at checkpoint­s. Local authoritie­s will be tasked with maintainin­g potable uncontamin­ated food supplies. If none of this works, evacuation will be ordered. Law enforcemen­t and military personnel are warned not to allow survivors to “go back for” family, friends, and loved ones. Any who do must be left behind.

The plan anticipate­s that human survivors would raid police stations, sporting-goods stores and armories for weapons.

The planners accept the popular view that zombies are not alive. Ordinarily, the measures that may be taken in armed conflict are legally and ethically restricted, but “US and internatio­nal law regulate

military operations only insofar as human and animal life are concerned.” Small wonder, therefore, that the plan envisions the use of nuclear weapons within US territory as necessary.

The idea is to use enough force to destroy large concentrat­ions of zombies, then conduct reconnaiss­ance to hunt down the rest. Finally, when the emergency ends, government will be turned back over to civil authoritie­s.

It all sounds good — good enough for us to wonder why The Walking Dead features no surviving military forces. But as CONPLAN 8888-11 freely admits, there are potential problems.

For one thing, determinin­g where to deploy forces requires accurate intelligen­ce, which likely would not be forthcomin­g. For another, the US military may not possess enough food and water to last in the zombie war.

Moreover, the document notes, not enough military facilities are actually hardened against zombie attack. The planners suggest that surviving aircraft try for Hawaii or various other Pacific islands, but seem pessimisti­c that many would make it.

And course there’s the risk that the invaders will turn out to be Evil Magic Zombies, or EMZs, in which case there will be little that convention­al military force can achieve. Still, the planners have a suggestion: “The Chaplain Corps may provide the only viable means of combating EMZs.” They document adds, ominously: “Atheists could be particular­ly vulnerable to EMZ threats.”

But put all of these concerns aside. At least somebody’s trying. You want the government to plan for low-probabilit­y disasters? Here’s a plan for a low-probabilit­y disaster. Sure, the chances of a zombie apocalypse are infinitesi­mal. But should it ever happen, the last few survivors will likely behave just like the journalist­s who seemed surprised to discover that catastroph­es, natural or otherwise, are occasional­ly worse than predicted. They’ll want to know who’s to blame. Good to know somebody’s thinking ahead.

 ??  ?? GIs to the rescue? : In case of a zombie apocalypse, the US army can draw on its mock but detailed ‘counter-zombie dominance’ plan.
GIs to the rescue? : In case of a zombie apocalypse, the US army can draw on its mock but detailed ‘counter-zombie dominance’ plan.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia